Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
You're absolutely correct there, but the design had the potential to be used with more than one purpose in mind, and the prototypes were so spot on they were made operational from the outset. Part of the illogical use of the Me 262 as a light bomber was that the AR234 was far better suited in this role. As the AR234 was susceptible to interception during its bombing run, Me 262's were the only fighter capable of flying faster to engage potential hostiles. At least that is what I've been reading; I'd just like some substantiated facts either wayI have my doubts about Ar 234s being escorted by Me 262. It would destroy the whole purpose of the Ar 234. Btw, it was foremost designed as a reconnaissance aircraft.
Kris
Quite possibly, but I don't recall reading about that myself.Was there not Me 262 "bombers" being escorted by Me 262 fighters? I thought I had read that somewhere.
The only way an Ar 234 could be intercepted if an enemy fighter plane would dive down on it and take it down in a single pass. All Ar 234s were unarmed and relied only on speed.You're absolutely correct there, but the design had the potential to be used with more than one purpose in mind, and the prototypes were so spot on they were made operational from the outset. Part of the illogical use of the Me 262 as a light bomber was that the AR234 was far better suited in this role. As the AR234 was susceptible to interception during its bombing run, Me 262's were the only fighter capable of flying faster to engage potential hostiles. At least that is what I've been reading; I'd just like some substantiated facts either way
Were the Mosquito recons escorted by Spits/Mustangs? I don't think they were.
Kris
Not all 234's were 'unarmed', some or all(?) had the/a rear firing 151's or the more usual 151/20's tail fixed to fire into the in tails blind spot, or perhaps counter weights if not fitted - yes effectively unarmed as trying to aim a rearwards sighted mg's with un-reversed controls through a rear-view periscope is going to be so easy... mind if the firing sting in the tails weren't expected, an allied pilot woould be initially more cautious if he suddenly had tracers zip close by.
Althought I don't think any allied aircraft was officially damaged or shot at in this way by the 234's as far as what I can remember reading from non-conspiracy non-nationalistic sources.
The early Ar234s types were designed to have one or two fixed MGs firing rearward, but were removed by the crews. They did keep the periscopic sight in place, though.
Thanks for the reply F16. It states my case perfectly!!!!! When I checked out the link, it says it is an AR234 B, which is totally incorrect. Erich Sommer did fly the worlds first Jet recon mission on August 2nd 1944, but in the AR234 A version, which landed on skids and had no undercarriage. The B model also had a wider fuselage, and carried bomb racks under the fuse and Jet nacelles. He was also never escorted by an Me 262 on that flight. Nice painting though, if you had a spare $145.00 to spend on art!