flying pancake?

Discussion in 'Aircraft Picture Requests' started by the lancaster kicks ass, Dec 20, 2003.

  1. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    i've recently read a small article about a experimental WW2american aircraft nicnamed "the flying pancake", i was wondering if anybody had anyinformation or knows about this plane?
     
  2. Crazy

    Crazy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    699
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Home Page:
    I'll look into it...


    (btw, great name ! :lol: )




    S!

    Crazee
     
  3. Crazy

    Crazy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    699
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Home Page:
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    "Vought XF5U "Flying Pancake"

    The brainchild of Charles H. Zimmerman, the F5U was intended to perform well as a fighter plane while being able to remain in flight at extremely low airspeed, making it easier to operate from carriers. The F5U's unusual appearance owed to a very low aspect ratio wing without a fuselage, which resulted in something looking like a flying saucer. This shape, combined with powerful engines driving large propellers, could plow through the air at low speed (40 mph!), since the whole airframe is immersed in the prop wash. As a result, short takeoff and landing (STOL) performance was possible. At the other end of the performance envelope, the low aspect ratio and lack of fuselage would decrease drag, maintaining a high maximum speed. Maneuverability at all speeds would be improved by a small reduction in wing loading compared to conventional fighters, combined with a more compact shape and prop wash going over all control surfaces.
    In 1941, Vought began building a low-power, full-scale demonstrator of wood and fabric construction, the V-173 (Bu. No. 02987), first flown on November 23, 1942, by Vought test pilot Boone T. Guyton. Other than test pilots Guyton and Richard Burroughs, the V-173 was also flown by Charles Lindbergh. In some 200 test flights, the V-173 proved Zimmerman right, having a low stall speed, relatively high maximum speed considering the powerplants, and being impossible to stall or put into a spin.

    Based on the success of the V-173, the Navy ordered two XF5U-1 prototypes (Bu. Nos. 33958/33959) in 1944. The airframes were completed in August, 1945. An interesting innovation as the use of "metalite" for the skin, a sandwich of balsa between two layers of aluminum. Unfortunately, it wasn't until 1947 that the special articulated propellers were delivered. Tethered tests were performed in Connecticut, but plans to flight test the F5U's at Edwards AFB (delivering them via the Panama Canal) were canceled in 1948, the Navy having lost interest in propeller-driven fighters."



    S!

    Crazee
     
  4. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    thanks for the info, i found it v. usefull :microwave:
     
  5. Crazy

    Crazy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    699
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Home Page:
    Glad you found it useful, m8!

    :D


    S!

    Crazee
     
  6. Crazy

    Crazy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    699
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Home Page:
    Found an interesting bit of info today... the flying pancake is one of the planes in the new flight sim 'Secret Weapons over Normandy'.

    I might have to look into this... :study:
     
  7. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    ohhhhhhhhh, interesting thanks, i read that they're restoring the last known example in America somewhere 0X
     
  8. Crazy

    Crazy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    699
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Home Page:
    If you find out where, be sure to post some links
     
  9. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    is he ok! :twisted:
     
  10. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,349
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    hi david, this is dan :microwave: i didnt know where else to contact you coz you're never on msn at the same time as me
     
  11. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    sorry, i read that article in a aircraft magazine..........
     
  12. Archer

    Archer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
  13. Crazy

    Crazy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    699
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Home Page:
    Really? I have CFS2, haven't played it in forever and ten days. IL-2: Forgotten Battles is so much better. If you were to put CFS2 on 'roids, IL-2 is CFS2 on 'roids, on 'roids! ;) 8)
     
  14. Archer

    Archer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    FB has great graphics, effects, etc, but it doesn't have carriers, Corsairs, SBDs, TBMs, Vals, Kates, or accurate Pacific scenery - which is what I enjoy the most in sims (well, CFS2). Graphics have to be acceptable, but no matter how good they are, not having the above items marks the sim as second-rate IMO :lol:
     
  15. Crazy

    Crazy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    699
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Home Page:
    FB is an Eastern-front based sim. You didn't see carriers steaming up the Volga in real life, so you don't in FB.

    It is expanding it's horizons and has added new scenery and a few Jap planes. But you want my opinion, that's so that it will sell better in Japan :confused:
     
  16. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    hey, whatever it takes..................
     
  17. Crazy

    Crazy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    699
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Home Page:
    True....



    Hey hey!!! There's a new one coming out, based on the IL-2 graphics engine that's based in the Pacific! Pacific Fighters, I believe it'll be called :D Rafe and Archer will be pleased, no doubt 8)
     
  18. Archer

    Archer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Other than not even having all of New Guinea available....and probably not all of the Solomons, ya, it looks good. I'll get it cuz the F4U-1A SnowPipe is making (WIP shots at netwings.org) looks amazing :p But from what Luthier said it sounds like its going to have too many shortcomings for my likings :p

    The Russians can never win :lol:
     
  19. Morpheus Duvall

    Morpheus Duvall New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2004
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    secret weapons over normandy is an excellent game
     
Loading...

Share This Page