Groundhog Thread Part Deux - P-39 Fantasy and Fetish - The Never Ending Story (Mods take no responsibility for head against wall injuries sustained) (6 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules


My examiner said the same thing to me. He said that besides verifying that I am a safe pilot, he also wanted to teach me something. That my checkride was not complete unless it was an important lesson.

His father had been killed in a spin, and he wanted to hone in on spin training, but the aircraft was restricted from spins at any time. But he did as much as he could to hone in on the importance of spin avoidance, and recovery from one. He went into more detail than the books or my instructor did during training. It was a great experience. I was on cloud nine afterwards.
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet said:
His father had been killed in a spin, and he wanted to hone in on spin training,
Click to expand...
A windshield full of trees going round and round is a lot less paralyzing if you've been there before. A trainer that's not spin able is a travesty. If it's capable of getting into a spin, but its spin characteristics are unsafe, then it's unairworthy and shouldn't be used as a trainer.
I never was comfortable with the FAA's promotion of "gentle" flight instruction. (Don't do anything that might make the student nervous or uncomfortable! And don't let them get the idea that there could be any fear involved.) That creates "armchair pilots" liable to freeze on the controls when that assymetric stall happens turning downwind to base because they were holding the nose too high and "ruddering" the plane around in their nervousness about lowering the nose and using the appropriate bank angle less than 1000 ft AGL.
Look at the accident statistics back in the day.
Cheers,
Wes
 

Just a "butt-in' thought on the phrase, "Slow-climbing P-39". See the performance figures for the A6M2 at http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/japan/a6m2-oct2342.pdf and P-39N at http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/P-39/P-39N_FS-M-19-1487-A.pdf

This suggests that climbing at low/medium altitude when bounced by a P-39 is not a good idea.

Just my 2 cents.
 
Poor Yoshino! He didn't have access to your sources. In fact, I believe Koga and his Zero weren't yet embarked on their carrier that day.
Cheers,
Wes
 
Those figures are for a P-39N, which had 225 more HP and somewhat less weight than the D. Besides, any previous experience the Japanese had against the P-39 was most likely meeting them and bouncing them as they struggled to intercept an incoming raid with very little warning.
Cheers,
Wes
 

I absolutely agree with you. I think spin training should be mandatory for a private pilot as well.

I remember my 1st cross country solo, I flew out to the first controlled airport, did my required touch and goes, got out and got my logbook signed by a person at the FBO. Then I took off and flew to my 2nd airport on my 2nd leg. I was so used to flying left traffic in my training, it really caught me off guard when the tower told me to fly right traffic. I asked them to repeat it, as if I had misunderstood them, but nope they said right traffic. I know I was making my base to final turn absolutely wrong, because I just was not used to it. My bank was too high, and I know my nose was too high. Stall warning came on, and it buffeted a little. I immediately lowered the nose, and was able to make a successful landing, but I can tell you my pucker factor was through the roof. My instructor had told me to do a few touch and goes there as well, before shutting down and getting my logbook signed. I had had enough for the day though after that happened, and decided to go to a complete stop, shut down, get some water, get my logbook signed, and then do a nice slow flight back home to my home airfield.
 
Your instructor was brave! I never sent students out for a triangular first solo XC, always an out-and-back, and then not to a tower controlled field. That would come later, after they had ironed out their navigation and gained a little confidence. Back in the day, PP standards required a "long solo cross-country" of three 100+ NM legs, so that was usually the last one one of the series.
Cheers,
Wes
 
Last edited:

I had to do three cross counties. 2 short, and 1 long.

I did a few out and about's with my instructor in the plane before doing the 1st cross country. All three cross countries included 3 stops, and all had to include a controlled airport. I'll have to look back at the requirements. I think the only the long requires 3 stops. As I said though, my instructor had me do it with all 3.
 
We used to do 4 cross-country flights, two to controlled airfields (one dual and one solo) and two to uncontrolled airports, again one each dual and solo.
It was the short sector flights that most students had problems with, when there are two airports less than 25nm from each other, things (radio calls, etc) happen fairly quickly for a student trying to make sure they do every position report they (thought they) need.
From memory the minimum requirement for PP was 10 hrs cross-country, minimum distance didn't come into it until commercial level.
 
fubar57 said:
I'm not seeing any 109s, 190s or -39s here people. JK ....I wish I had learned to fly when I had the chance
Click to expand...

You are absolutely right Fubar, from this point further I will refrain from talking further about the P-39's abilities in the Pacific. Just want to take a moment though to thank Parsifal and XBe02Drvr for their candid and interesting opinions concerning both axis victories and Yoshino's demise. Now on to the Nazi stuff!
 
Personally, I would welcome a break from the endless P-39 discussions.
 
Correct, the P-39N was a much better climber than the earlier D,F,K and L with the earlier -35 engine.
 
Greg Boeser said:
9 June 1942. Koga and his Zero were upside down in the muskeg and had been there four days. (Remember, Akutan Island is on the other side of the dateline.)
Click to expand...
Oops, my bad! I somehow got the idea in my thick head that the Yoshino event happened in April before Coral Sea and Midway. Guess I better wake up and pay attention!
Cheers,
Wes
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 7 (members: 0, guests: 7)

Similar threads

Paper comparing the flight performance of the P-40E Warhawk and the A6M2 Zero
Replies
8
Views
716
Ivan1GFP
I
The poor performance of the 343 Kokutai against USAAF fighters
2 3 4
Replies
60
Views
6K
GrauGeist
617th squadron and the bunkers in Ijmuiden.
2
Replies
23
Views
652
DerAdlerIstGelandet
M
P-39 Turbo - Here We Go Again
Replies
13
Views
2K
GregP
P-39-style fighter by other people?
2 3
Replies
50
Views
2K
GrauGeist
Menu
Log in
Register