Hawker Sea Fury

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Could you say where you read about the cooling drag of the Ta 152 being 80% of the Fw 190A's?
Here: table.
Under the 'Widerstandsantelile' ('drag distribution', roughly) group, item 'Kühlung'. For level flight it is stated as 0.0073 m^2 for the Fw 190A8 and A9, and 0.00610 m^2 for the Ta-152C, E and H. Fuselage drag was also higher for the 190As than for the Ta-152 or 190Ds.
 
Here: table.
Under the 'Widerstandsantelile' ('drag distribution', roughly) group, item 'Kühlung'. For level flight it is stated as 0.0073 m^2 for the Fw 190A8 and A9, and 0.00610 m^2 for the Ta-152C, E and H. Fuselage drag was also higher for the 190As than for the Ta-152 or 190Ds.

Thanks This is very informative. Browsing through the chart I found a lot of questions of the "What is...?" kind.
But the first thing I noticed is at the 'Kühlung' row that the figure for the Fw 190Ds is 0.00390 sqm which means it only has 53.4 % cooling drag of the Fw 190A and 63.9 % of the Ta 152's.
I knew that the liquid-cooled radiator configuration was less draggy but wouldn't expect it to be that much.

I wonder how the cooling flaps when opened affected this advantage of the Dora/152?

You have cooling drag figures of the other major WW2 fighters to compare?
 

ORIGINAL AIR MINISTRY MW801

1639307313871.png
 
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Yep .. the foreground one is registered as D-CAMI while the background one D-CATA. Both of them have the small German flag marking on the fins.

 
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back