If It Can Fly, It Can Float!!! (2 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Loire-Nieuport 10

0595023.thumb.jpg.a66c5b6ed6ea2eba7a870ff2ad0ac339.jpg
 
Float yes:

View attachment 852320

Fly: Supposedly it did ...once...on 21 July 1939. However, on 10 December 1939, the programme was cancelled as the French Navy had decided to use land based aircraft instead.

Float and fly, yes.

See :

And this strange floatplane had a four-engines land version, the SNCAO 700, that was ready .to fly... two days before French collapse in June 1940.
 
IDK if GTX GTX is Rex, if he whispers to his ears, is a patreon with early access or is it just a coincidence, but just fresh from the oven, Rex Hangar take of the Besson H-5:


View: https://youtu.be/oKvQxPrbOgs?si=B5-qcma4sVPZ90b9


The Besson H-5 design was certainly quite unusual, but infinitely less daring than the Caproni Ca-60 :


which, with its tri-triplane configuration, established what could be called an Olympic record.

It's a shame Greg's hangar doesn't mention this Italian aircraft; comparing the two seaplanes would have been much more interesting than comparing the enormous Besson to a tiny two-seater from De Monge—which, incidentally, wasn't French, but Belgian.

This isn't the first time Greg's hangar has demonstrated a lack of historical knowledge that hardly aligns with its stated ambitions.

Returning to the Besson, while the result is certainly strange, it's worth noting that its fuselage is far more streamlined than many contemporary aircraft, even seaplanes ! We also notice Townsend-like rings around the radial engines, a design feature that remained unknown to most manufacturers in the mid-1920s.

Finally, it shouldn't be assumed that the engineers who designed these monsters were completely ignorant of aerodynamics. They were simply trapped by some outdated design flaws and hadn't yet learned to distinguish between essential and secondary considerations. At that time, projects from EVERY country in the world were a striking blend of sophistication and crude drawings.
 
We also notice Townsend-like rings around the radial engines, a design feature that remained unknown to most manufacturers in the mid-1920s.
Perhaps they remained unknown to most designers because they were not around the engines but in front of the them. Perhaps they served two or three purposes. The main one seems to have a streamline exhaust system. May also have helped streamline the valve system? actual streamlining of the engine itself???
Some Salmson aircraft that used pusher engines (like the ones in the back of the H-5) had the ring behind the engine compared to the airflow.
 
I agree that these were not Townsend rings but exhaust manifolds and similar to those that were used on Bristol engines of the day. There were several US engines with forward facing exhaust systems as well but the only ones I can remember at present used higher drag circular cross sectioned exhaust rings "identical" to those used on engines which exhausted to the rear.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back