In a battle zone, what target would you attack first?

• Apr 11, 2007

• #21

pbfoot

1st Lieutenant

6,974

33

Apr 14, 2005

niagara falls

I f I knew I could pick more then one schools and hospitals would have been selected

 

• Apr 11, 2007

• Thread starter
• #22

Soundbreaker Welch?

Tech Sergeant

1,742

10

Feb 8, 2006

Colorado, USA

Really?

I should have been nastier and added in Schools, I guess.

War is Hell.

 

• Apr 11, 2007

• #23

timshatz

Chief Master Sergeant

3,912

25

Mar 29, 2006

Phila, Pa

"Secondary targets are a Harmonica Factory and a School for Mimes"

 

• Apr 11, 2007

• #24

Njaco

The Pop-Tart Whisperer

22,501

2,564

Feb 19, 2007

Fla-eee-dah!

you forgot the local PETA headquarters.

 

• Apr 12, 2007

• Thread starter
• #25

Soundbreaker Welch?

Tech Sergeant

1,742

10

Feb 8, 2006

Colorado, USA

LOL!

Or for that matter, the dog pound.

 

• Apr 12, 2007

• #26

DerAdlerIstGelandet

Private Chemtrail Disperser

Staff

Mod

50,415

16,280

Nov 8, 2004

USA/Germany

I would take out all the media building as well. No media no false news getting out.

 

• Apr 13, 2007

• #27

102first_hussars

Tech Sergeant

2,088

10

Oct 3, 2005

Edmonton,Alberta

First i would gain complete air superiority, first by attacking radar stations, than the airfeilds, then i would shift to attacking communications and enemy HQ, after that i would attack the supply transports and shipping to starve the enemy front lines, then i would attack the front lines directly.

 

• Apr 13, 2007

• Thread starter
• #28

Soundbreaker Welch?

Tech Sergeant

1,742

10

Feb 8, 2006

Colorado, USA

Spoken like a real General, you 'ave sorr.

 

• Apr 14, 2007

• #29

timshatz

Chief Master Sergeant

3,912

25

Mar 29, 2006

Phila, Pa

DerAdlerIstGelandet said:

I would take out all the media building as well. No media no false news getting out.

Click to expand...

Bomb the local Bar or Cathouse. Kill more reporters there than anywhere else.

 

• Apr 15, 2007

• #30

Njaco

The Pop-Tart Whisperer

22,501

2,564

Feb 19, 2007

Fla-eee-dah!

and the doughnut shops.

Communications and media. Keep'em blind and yourself secret.

 

• Apr 16, 2007

• #31

Ajax

Airman 1st Class

139

0

Mar 19, 2007

Evesham, UK

I chose:

1) Communications: Computers, wire, ect. To stop scatter the enemy, prevent battleplans forming, and hold off reinforcements

2) WMD of any kind. That one's a no-brainer. Any country at war posessing WMDs will beat a country without WMDs. Fact. (if it uses them, that is)

3) Sabotage Targets: Power Grid, Water Pipes, ect Prevent the vital supplies reaching troops and production plants. Stop the power grid and people are affected directly, which is also a good propoganda victory.

And bomb the banks. Just for the hell of it.

 

• Jun 4, 2007

• #32

H

HealzDevo

Staff Sergeant

1,358

24

Oct 26, 2004

Queensland

I would engage with a massive bomber raid with fighters and go:
1. AA emplacements.
2. Airfields basing fighters and enemy bombers.
3. Communications- preferably attempt to drop an EMP bomb.
4. Take out production assets.
5. Then start picking off their tanks, ships, troops, etc.

 

• Mar 8, 2008

• #33

wm3456

Airman

16

0

Mar 7, 2008

If I'm your basic by the book, follow orders, system managing, highly trained professional, I'm probably ging to deliver my payload exactly where the mission profile dictates.
On the other hand if we assume I am a s**t hot, death dealing sky stud who wants to get back to base in time for cocktail hour so I can stand around and hold my hands at funny angles and make funny noises with my fellow studs, I would probably frag whatever SOB was trying to prevent me from doing it.