Main battle tanks of today.....

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Hello Matt308,

No turret removed, the Leo was just taken as it is. The turret compartment is quite spacious for the crew, damn cramped with 4 extra infantry guys added (the tank crew then existed only by the driver and commander), so 2 crew + 6 infantry soldiers.

So the Leo was used in the function of an APC not as an AFV.

The Marder 1A3 APC/AFV was never further upgraded due to budget constrains in the years before, and since our loudmouth politicians wanted to "contribute" the Bundeswehr, the Leo was found to be the only save means of transportation in hazardous, landmine invested terrain.
Mostly due to this "APC incident" a "special" budget was allocated to upgrade around 250 Marders 1A3 into Marder 1A5 which then resulted into actually only 100 1A5's build due to the usual budget cuts.

Everybody is now waiting for the Puma AFV since the Boxer already ran into "unexpected" budget cuts.

Regards
Kruska
 
Hello Kurfuerst,

let's hope the Bundeswehr gets the necessary $$$$ alocated before 2015, because by then it would be as usefull/useless as a today's Marder 1A3.

Regards
Kruska
 
Germans IMO make the best APCs in the world. there is only one problem, they cost a truckload of cash, meaning that peacetime armies have to spend a motza on battlefield transport, which might otherwise be spent on other items.
 
Great info guys

I could be wrong but..........

I was thinking in this last round of fighting in the medeast last year ..Israel did loose a lot of tanks ...A lot more then they were thinking they would ...??

Am I right or .......?
 
I think the Israeli Merkava has a limited proper APC capability. From memory i think it is about 4 combat troops, and this tiny little hatchway at the rear of the tank
 
The most interesting thing about the Merkava is the emergency escape hatch, that's very smart.
 
parsifal said:
I think the Israeli Merkava has a limited proper APC capability. From memory i think it is about 4 combat troops, and this tiny little hatchway at the rear of the tank
Click to expand...

Hello parsifal,

The Merkava MK.1, 2, 3 and 4 do have NBC protection/overpressure systems, with air-condition added since MK.3. for the infantry guys.
The rear hatch for the accompanying infantry also acts as escape/rescue hatch for in taking wounded soldiers.
Another very unique feature is the internal mounted 60mm mortar.

Regards
Kruska
 
My personal opinion…..

Tanks are mobile armors that must protect the crew extensively during the assault with enough firepower to stop the enemies.

Leopard 2 has the latest technology when it comes to tanks but it has not yet extensively proven in the battlefield compared to M1Abrams, Challenger 2 and the Merkava. M1 Abrams and the Challenger has been proven extensively throughout the gulf wars up to today and even the Merkava has been proven since the Golan Heights War and ever adapting and changing up to today especially its survivability.

If I am a tank commander now, I want to be on an M1 Abrams as I know its proven capability. If I am a member of the IDF (Israel Defense Force), surely there will be no other tank for me than the Merkava. The Merkava is designed specifically for Israel and Israel only, that's why there are no export customers for this tank. Some would say that the Merkava is too large and has a greater signature it's because of the desert landscapes and the environment of Israel. It is designed for crew survivability first and foremost. As I have researched, Merkava is tank for defensive and small assaults and not to be used for large scale assaults like the Abrams and the Challenger.

By the way, if I have a son in his teens, I would recommend the Leo2 for it is the tank of the future.
 
Merkava all the way, baby

As for not being capable for a sustained battle, I'd like to see some proofs for that.
 
Thorlifter said:
Do you think it's an outdated weapon?
Click to expand...
It's difficult to see a future for MBTs now that the Cold War is over, certainly in the long term. War and strategy are moving away from classical battlefield engagements and into highly mobile war and/or counter-terrorism campaigns.

Likely, a terrorist is not going to confront your state-of-the-art MBT with another tank, he's going to ambush it with roadside devices and MBTs make for costly losses, especially when the people who did it are nowhere to be seen.

I work for a defence contractor and the next-gen vehicles that we are currently preparing a contract bid for are wheeled, rather than tracked; there is talk that Challenger 2 was the last traditional MBT that the British Army will receive.
 
Tanks do have a limited defense against laser guided munitions, many of the latest tanks have the ability to fir a spray of fog from their smoke grenade launchers intended to disrupt the beam from a guidance laser.
 

You are definitely off base with that one. While you are right about the nature of recent engagements, that in no way negates a role that the tank plays in today's military. Highly mobile is exactly the type of war that the tank is suited to fight, and the ability to lead attacks with mounted or dismounted infantry makes them valuable combined arms assets. Not to mention it would be quite foolish for a military to rid themselves of all heavily armored assets, which would create a huge vulnerability.
 
Lucky13 said:
Which is best, all things considered, on the battlefield today?

Is the Leopard 2


Challenger 2


M1 Abrams


Leclerc


Type 99


T-90


Arjun


Merkava


Missed anyone...?
Click to expand...

is it just me or is the merkava kinda look like those new moblie artillary pieces
 
Yeah, it does. Heavily armored sucker, that's for sure.

What I find impressive about the above photos is the only one that is an actual "in action" shot is the Abrams. Nothing like a battle tested machine to give it credibility.
 
Merkava looks like SP artillery piece since it has engine in front, like those. That obviously dictates the turret goes at the back.

Of course, along with Abrams and Challengers, Merkava has enough won battles under belt.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

The F16 Turned 50 Years Old Today, Dec 13 1973.
Replies
13
Views
950
cvairwerks
C
M
The Wrath of KAAN?
Replies
3
Views
884
Snautzer01
M
The USAF V-22 Mishap of 2023
Replies
2
Views
529
Thumpalumpacus
M
What Is The Point Of This?
Replies
3
Views
688
SaparotRob
S
Request help identifying type of aircraft
Replies
4
Views
1K
MiTasol
Menu
Log in
Register