Clayton Magnet
Staff Sergeant
- 903
- Feb 16, 2013
So was a Sopwith Camel, and it was only slightly more outdated than the P-26 in 1940The P-26 on the other hand is very agile.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
So was a Sopwith Camel, and it was only slightly more outdated than the P-26 in 1940The P-26 on the other hand is very agile.
It was still in service because the Philippine Army Air Corps had nothing else, not because it was in any way competitive. They fought valiantly, but were hopelessly outclassed against even second tier Japanese fighters like the A5M.P-26 was still operational in 1941. So must have been good in 1940.
HiIt was still in service because the Philippine Army Air Corps had nothing else, not because it was in any way competitive. They fought valiantly, but were hopelessly outclassed against even second tier Japanese fighters like the A5M.
The Gloster Gamecock was technically still in service in 1940, even though it was obsolete a decade earlier
On Family Feud the P-26 scored Zero.Was it ever proved/disproved that a P-26 scored a Zero?
Alex, "What is a Peashooter?" for 200...On Family Feud the P-26 scored Zero.
Name a ww2 fighter?
P-26.
Our survey said....
The Finns used the Gamecock during the Winter War in 1940, albeit in very limited numbersHi
The Gloster Gamecock was declared obsolete by the RAF in March 1933, how was it 'technically' still in service in 1940?
Mike
It could be said, but not in the time frame of the OP question. Part of the BoB was tactical and about quality of machines. A bigger part was about production, intel (what you think or know about your opponent) and psychology. During the BoB the British were massively out producing Germany in fighters at a rate of around 500 to 250 per month, the British were also returning damaged aircraft to service much more quickly because the LW hadnt set up anything to do it in France. At the crux of the Battle in September Goering and his staff believed the RAF were down to the last 50 fighters while in fact the British numerically were as strong as ever and the Duxford wing itself contained 50 Hurricanes. Much has been lost in the sands of time but the appearance of the Duxford wing over London, despite not achieving what they claimed in aerial "victories" had a massive effect on the bomber crews, talk of being down to "the last 50" was fantasy, they are as strong as ever.The same could be said about the Bf 109, which was very inexpensive and quick to manufacture
The P-26 is far better than any Spitfire or 109 when it came to having trousered undercarriage.
That to me is the most important thing in a fighter.
Trousered undercarriage.
Spitfire was a 14th century term for "fat legs"
The Philippine's 6th Pursuit Sqd. did down IJN aircraft on 10 December (1 G3M, 3 A6M) and saw a great deal of action ober the next few days.Was it ever proved/disproved that a P-26 scored a Zero?
The Finns used the Gamecock during the Winter War in 1940, albeit in very limited numbers