Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Edit: Didn't the MiG-17's see combat over, eeerrrrmmm......the Straits of Taiwan, when they clashed with Sabres in.....'58? Any idea how this dispute ended?
This incident was more sensitive at the time because it *undeniably* involved a Soviet AF unit, flying from Soviet territory. But actually all 8 encounters between USN F9F's and MiG-15's in Korea were with Soviet AF units, the others flying from bases in China. The 3 MiG victories credited to F9F's in November 1950 were Soviet (2 MiG's actually lost, the two victories Nov 18 1950 were a duplicate over claim). Of 4 USMC F9F v MiG encounters two were definitely w/ Soviet units, including the one where an F9F was (probably*) lost to a MiG, one mentioned in PLAAF accounts, and one not mentioned in known opposing accounts, probably v the PLAAF. But the Soviet MiG units flying from China were not incontrovertably Soviet.MM, thanks for the update on the F9F V Mig 15 encounter. There once was a website online about the whole affair. I believe it was kept a secret for sometime because of the Soviet involvement.
The only really solid facts we can ever determine is what the opposing sides' original records say about air combat. Very detailed US records show air combat losses in Korea perhaps 15% of Soviet credits (including the few non US, UN air combat losses), with the main uncertainty being how to account for competing Chinese claims. But the claim accuracy was around the same in the period of the MiG war before significant PLAAF invovlement (a few definite NK MiG victories are known, but they aren't statistically significant).Joe B - I understand you are diplomatic- but - what is your view of the description of Russian Mig pilots that I linked to at the lend Lease website, a few posts back in this thread.
I am familiar with reading Soviet accounts of things and get a sense of where the truth is being viewed from behind Party-Colored Glasses.
"... It was made possible after a Taiwanese AIM-9B hit a Chinese Communist MiG-17 without exploding, the missile lodging itself in the airframe of the MiG after which the pilot was able to bring both plane and missile back to base. According to Ron Westrum in his book "Sidewinder", the Soviets obtained the plans for Sidewinder from a Swedish Air Force Colonel, Stig Wennerström, and rushed their version into service by 1961 copying it so closely that even the part numbers were duplicated, although none of the known Soviet sources mention this. Years later, Soviet engineers would admit that the captured Sidewinder served as a "university course" in missile design and substantially improved Soviet and allied air-to-air capabilities. In 1972, when the Finnish Air Force started using Sidewinder (AIM-9P) in their Saab 35 Draken fighters, they were already using Soviet -made Atoll in their MiG-21s; Finns found the two so similar that they tested Sidewinders in MiGs and Atolls in Drakens ..."
Unlikely. Occam pretty much nailed it.
MM