wuzak
Captain
What if in early 1943, during the time which the Mosquito B.IX (and PR.IX) was being developed, the low level daylight bombing raids by 105 and 139 squadrons impressed the RAF BC hierarchy enough that they decided to maintain one or two dedicated daylight Mosquito bomber squadrons.
Then as the IX came on stream in mid 1943 a decision was made to do to the Mosquito what was done with the Spitfire VIII IX - split into high altitude and low altitude versions.
Thus the LB.IX could be born, using a pair of Merlin 66s for low altitude performance. This would give a marginal performance boost, if at all, at low levels, but still improved performance at higher altitudes.
In early-mid 1944 when 150 grade fuel is approved for use the 66 could be turned up to give around 2000hp at low level with +25psi boost. That should give the Mosquito pretty good performance at 5000ft and below.
Then if we can get +28psi into the 66 power will nearly peak at 2200hp.
http://www.spitfireperformance.com/merlin66hpchart.jpg
Having looked over at Spitfire performance I now wonder if the single stage engine would be just as good for a low altitude LB.IV. I see some of the NF squadrons got to use 150 grade fuel when combating V-1s. Certainly the 200-250lb weight savings per engine would be of benefit.
Given how difficult the Luftwaffe could find the Mosquito to intercept at low level, how effective could a squadron using a LB.IX (or LB.IV), armed with 4 x 500lb bombs (+2 x 500lb on the wings as an option), 2 x 1000lb bombs (+2 x 500lb on the wings as an option) or 1 x 4000lb MC bomb (HC bomb didn't liek being dropped at high speed at low level, apparently), be?
Then as the IX came on stream in mid 1943 a decision was made to do to the Mosquito what was done with the Spitfire VIII IX - split into high altitude and low altitude versions.
Thus the LB.IX could be born, using a pair of Merlin 66s for low altitude performance. This would give a marginal performance boost, if at all, at low levels, but still improved performance at higher altitudes.
In early-mid 1944 when 150 grade fuel is approved for use the 66 could be turned up to give around 2000hp at low level with +25psi boost. That should give the Mosquito pretty good performance at 5000ft and below.
Then if we can get +28psi into the 66 power will nearly peak at 2200hp.
http://www.spitfireperformance.com/merlin66hpchart.jpg
Having looked over at Spitfire performance I now wonder if the single stage engine would be just as good for a low altitude LB.IV. I see some of the NF squadrons got to use 150 grade fuel when combating V-1s. Certainly the 200-250lb weight savings per engine would be of benefit.
Given how difficult the Luftwaffe could find the Mosquito to intercept at low level, how effective could a squadron using a LB.IX (or LB.IV), armed with 4 x 500lb bombs (+2 x 500lb on the wings as an option), 2 x 1000lb bombs (+2 x 500lb on the wings as an option) or 1 x 4000lb MC bomb (HC bomb didn't liek being dropped at high speed at low level, apparently), be?