Most Beautiful Aircraft of WW2?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules


Wot? No anti glare panel? You must have great sunglasses!
 

Well...that's certainly one interpretation but there are a few other considerations, for example:
  • USAAF 8th Air Force aircraft operated at high altitudes where contrails were common. If you're making contrails, then camouflage is pretty useless.
  • Upper surface camouflage is most useful when the aircraft is on the ground. By the time NMF airframes were arriving, most USAAF squadrons were operating from airfields that weren't under much threat of air attack. For example, the airfields of the 8th and 9th Air Forces were solidly protected by RAF Fighter Command.
  • The change to NMF was somewhat gradual, with many USAAF fighters and medium bombers retained upper surface camouflage even when other surfaces remained in NMF.
 
Interestingly enough, I read an analysis that said that the OD paint on B-17''s did not really weigh very much ( around 100 lb) but actually reduced drag as compared to bare metal aircraft because it smoothed over the finish.

And P-51's had all their wings painted, regardless of paint scheme, because it was part of the process for puttying over and smoothing the finish to maintain laminar flow.

Late in the war the USN was painting its Hellcats all over blue, top and bottom, while the USAAF was painting A-26's OD all over top and bottom.
 
If they were NMF nothing would say "this is a fighter Airfield better than a dozen polished aluminium Spitfires parked in the countryside.
There were a small number of Seafire III amongst the FAA squadrons in the East Indies and British Pacific Fleets around the end of WW2. This example on HMS Hunter entering Singapore Harbour on 11th Sept 1945.

NN300 of 807 squadron. CO's aircraft heading up the range.

And one on Indefatigable's deck during a courtesy visit to New Zealand in Dec 1945. Poor quality as it came from a newspaper article.

 
That is a cool looking plane, what is it?
 

Attachments

  • 131896-43920-35-pristine.jpeg
    68 KB · Views: 18
Last edited:
F-106 used high pressure gas bottles to power the pneumatic actuators used to lower and raise the missile launchers as well as open and close the missile bay doors. MUCH faster in operation than hydraulics, but you want to talk about something that could screw you up good... The T.O. on the missile launch actuator basically said to follow the instructions EXACTLY if you did not want to die. Another engineer told me he needed some help on it and I asked why. He replied he was too scared to mess with it. When I read the manual I saw why.

As far as the B-58, I guess I should count myself lucky that it was gone by the time I came on active duty.
 
True quite true. It was crazy fast. Nice way to loose an arm or head.
 

Users who are viewing this thread