Most Overrated aircraft of WWII.....?

The most over-rated aircraft of WW2


  • Total voters
    409

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules


The P-47 could do long-range missions, but you had to carry a lot of external fuel. There's one picture of an earlier P-47D loaded up with a 150-gallon 'flat' belly tank and a 108-gallon paper tank under each wing. That's an external load of 366 gallons, and combined with its internal 305 gallons, it was carrying a total of 671 gallons of aviation fuel.
 
That would have been for a ferry mission, they typically carried a single centerline tank when escorting.
 
Granted, it had to carry a lot of external fuel to get to the fight, but the bomber boys were mighty glad it got there.

It's an interesting 'what if'. If the need for drop tanks had been understood from the outset, and sufficient numbers and sizes of drop tanks are available for the P-47 in the late summer or early fall of 1943, does the P-51 with a Merlin engine still happen for the USAAF the way it did historically?

(A related question would be if the P-38's troubles in northern Europe could have been sorted out sooner.)
 
And it was Egon Meyer, an ace who ended up with over a hundred kills, so I think it's safe to say the proportion of hits was probably pretty good.
Other authors have expressed doubt about Mayer's alleged encounter with Johnson. There is no direct evidence Mayer was involved in this battle. No III./JG 2 pilot is present on victory or loss records according to the most complete German sources.

 
Granted, it had to carry a lot of external fuel to get to the fight, but the bomber boys were mighty glad it got there.
You have have to use internal tanks for warm up take off and climb in case something goes wrong and combat uses fuel at circa three time that of cruise so more external than internal fuel means you can get to a place you cant fight back from. Also the weight drag of all those tanks means 300external gallons doesnt do what 300 internal gallons do.
 
Of the three aircraft the USA had to do long range escort and ground attack in Europe, when it comes to availability at the start, ability to do both jobs and numbers produced the P-47 scores highly, both parts of the USA strategy would have been in trouble without it.
 
The idea that the P-47 was "short ranged" needs a little context.
It had shorter range than needed for the job it was asked to do in 1943, Both in the ETO and the south Pacific.
It had roughly double the range of most European fighters in 1941-42 when it was being designed, developed.

What other fighters in 1941-42 or early 1943 could match the P-47s range?
What fighters, of any nation, would have been any better at B-17 escort or the South West Pacific missions in early/mid 1943?
There are a few but there is a difference between not being in first place and being in the middle of the pack (or in the bottom 1/2 of the pack).
 
I'm aware that external tanks add to drag and would have to be jettisoned in a fight. The point I was making was that with drop tanks, the P-47 got further and was able to escort much farther. I can't quantify any numbers but it was from this Forum that I learned that the Thunderbolt was a capable escort fighter. It was a myth busted here that the P-51 was the only Allied fighter able to escort the bomber stream. I'm sure the bomber crews were happy to see the Jugs. I'm always happy when I see Jugs.
 
Hi Shortround - not sure which P-47D version but based on 13000#GW (and 70"MP) used in the comparisons it probably was a late D-16 to -22 with full internal fuel (305gal) and basic ammo. The P-51B has full internal load (184Gal) w/o Fuselage tank and the P-38J is light internal fuel and ammo at 15000# GW. Full internal combat load of P-38J is 17000 full wing fuel w/o LE fuel tanks and 17600 with full LE tanks. June 26 1944 Report.


You can see that for the presented data for MP at 10,000 feet for all ships, the P-51B out rolls both P-47D and P-38J (W/O boosted ailerons) by wide margin. Note also that somebody was putting his thumb on the scales for the P-38J --- allowing 80 pounds stick force for roll (vs 50 pounds for P-47, P-51 and XP-80) and flying the P-38J well under combat load (15,000 vs 17,000).
 
The order and events important to ETO began with Lt.Col Cass Hough who formulated a pressurization system modification to the instrumentation vacuum system in May 1943 timeframe as the lower 'keel' with shackle provisions kits were arriving for installation at Burtonwood BAD1. The Newly arriving D-1 and D-4 dis not have factory equipped keel/shackle. 8th AF contracted local Brit suppliers for the 108gal paper tanks, as deliveries from States of both the 75 and 108gal steel combat tanks were not yet in transit.

In June and July Hough orchestrated tests on the P-47 steel 205 gal tank. In parallel, the 75 gal steel ferry tanks for P-39 were also bein modified as none of the Brit 108gal paper tanks would arrive until September. The pressurization kits were introduced in August for the 75 gal steel tank in August and the 108 gal tank in September.

The draggy, unpressurized, 205gal ferry tank was discontinued in August.

Notably, plans to modify all VIII FC P-47s for wing pylons, which would be introduced in production P-47D-16, began in November - but the mod was Very labor intensive and deliveries would not begin until February 1944.
 
The Mark I Mustang had 40% more range (than all P-47C/D up to -22) with full internal tanks. Add the auxiliary tanks by removing wing armament (retain cowl 50.s) and the range (loaded ammo/220gal) had a tested range of 1700 miles. The kits were designed for RAF and delivered with all Mustang I's. I have not yet uncovered the tactical use for the extended range - but recon use potential is obvious.

Recall that NA-73 Mustang I was in combat ops a full year earlier than any P-47. The RAF did not have the inventory to split delivered NA-73/83 between Army Cooperation Command and also devote squadrons for daylight medium bombers in MTO - but they would have been superior in that role to Spitfire, Hurricane, P-39, P-40
 

Users who are viewing this thread