Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I have to agree with this. In many of the discussions, weight to the argument is given to length of service. DC-3/C-47 remained in service (somewhere) for a very long time. The last time I was in Port-Au-Prince I saw one sitting at the edge of the taxiway. (a quick visual left airworthiness very much in doubt)We've had discussions here to the same, IMO the C-47 was the best all round aircraft of WW2. Too many people are hung up on combat aircraft to appreciate it's importance, not only in performing its mission, but the operational and developmental legacy it paved in later years.
There are still some in commercial service to this very day.I have to agree with this. In many of the discussions, weight to the argument is given to length of service. DC-3/C-47 remained in service (somewhere) for a very long time. The last time I was in Port-Au-Prince I saw one sitting at the edge of the taxiway. (a quick visual left airworthiness very much in doubt)
I always liked the unusual bomb bays located in the wings of the Stirling
Actually that was almost standard for British bombers of the 30s.I always liked the unusual bomb bays located in the wings of the Stirling
There are still some in commercial service to this very day.
Either in their original configuration or converted to Turboprops.
There are still some in commercial service to this very day.
Either in their original configuration or converted to Turboprops.
Looking at the Stirling bomb bays, the problem was not the length at 42 feet, but the fact that this was divided into three bomb cells and due to the strengthening girders these could never be altered to accommodate weapons more than 19 inches in diametre. Nevertheless it could carry the bomb loads in the specification, notably the seven 2000 lb bombs which the Air Ministry thought vital for attacking enemy surface vessels. The bomb carriers could be converted from 250lb to 500lb to 2000lb in short order.
This longitudinal division of the bomb bay was not unique to the Stirling, the Wellington was somewhat similar and if I remember correctly the Blenheim was also divided, though just into two..
Cheers
Steve
Yep. Goodyear built Corsairs, Arado and Dornier built 190's...."... Grumman was very underrated with their rugged birds"
Many of which were built by GM .....
So did Weserflug, Seibel, Mimetall, Feisler and Ago....Arado and Dornier built 190's....
As a transport the Sterling was pretty good and thinking about it a good contender for the aircraft in a secondary role thread.
edit - additional information
On the 5th August three Sterling's from 620 Sqd joined the USAAF base at Harrington to assist with the dropping of people taking part in a Carpet Bagger operation. The original plan was to use six Liberators but changed when it was realised that three Sterling's could do the job.
They caused quite a stir as it was the first time they had seen a Sterling close up and the whole thing was filmed by one Captain John Ford. So somewhere there is an interesting film to be dug up
True and thanks for the information. I believe the USAAF used modified B24D's for the carpetbagger flights, which were modified for the mission but to what degree I don't know but understood that the tail and dorsal turrets were left. If you have any more info it would be appreciated.
The 801st PG (later renamed 492nd) of the 8th AF, primarily operated modified B-24D types with ball turret, nose MG and oxygen equipment removed, but also operated quite an interesting list of additional types:I really don't know what the USAAF operated in this role...