How long till you start flying the beast, mkloby?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Point taken I've seen some of the mugs of your aircrew plastered up against the plexiglass and it wouldn't be nice to see so much ugly at the same time so giving them a pretty airplane equals it outThe major difference is that that thing is too damn Ugly to be used by the USMC, USN, USAF, or US Army....
How long till you start flying the beast, mkloby?
Point taken I've seen some of the mugs of your aircrew plastered up against the plexiglass and it wouldn't be nice to see so much ugly at the same time so giving them a pretty airplane equals it out
Amen to that!!! Anyway, I have heard from the rumor mill that the Osprey is being considered for the gunship role, much like the C-130, although probably with less powerful armament. Is there any merit to this rumor? On another not, I have read that the Osprey can be equiped with a .50 cal somewhere on the plane, my question is where?we just put on the leather jacket and play top gun theme
those must have been air force guys... naval aviators have to be good looking! If we're not, we just put on the leather jacket and play top gun theme
Being from Pensacola, I can tell you that my sister told me that she had never met a bad looking Naval aviator. She didn't say anything about Marines, however. Don't know if that means anything.
As a young guy growing up there, the competition was tough. Lost my first girlfriend to a Naval aviator. Marriage didn't last however. Serves her right! Actually worked out great for me, married a wonderful girl.
As a young Student Naval Aviator 34 years ago, I married a different
girl every weekend. I'm sure things haven't changed!
And Marine pilots most
certainly are Naval Aviators...It is their finest quality!
I certainly wouldn't say the Fa 269 was a common design theory in 1933 when Dr. Heinrich Karl Johann Focke came up with it!
True enough but the reason the Germans couldn't go forward then was that considerable development was needed for the special gearboxes, drives, pivoting mechanisms and prop pitch controls for landing and taking off. Too many other priorities in the Reich at the time.
Got to go with dave on this one. I dont think the Germans could have gotten it going by 1945. They had to many priorities and look how long the US has been working on the V-22 and how many problems they have had with it and how many have died in the process. It was not a project to be had during the time of WW2.