DarrenW
Staff Sergeant
It's always good to question sources. However, Francillon's book is still considered the benchmark when discussing Japanese WWII aircraft mainly because he did search out official Japanese documents whenever possible. In addition, Nakajima Ki-84 a/b Hayate in Japanese Army Air Force Service (Bueschel) reiterates these same performance stats and his book had a multitude of aviation researchers involved, many of whom were of Japanese descent. So I suspect that this data is as accurate as humanly possible.2. The Fancillon data is for the prototypes, which lacked thrust augmentation exhaust stacks, used an unspecified fuel type (probably 92 octane), had 1,800 HP engines (as you mentioned), used an unknown test methodology, etc... So these are not indicative of actual performance either. Also, I could not find any of Francillon's sources. I'm not sure where he got his data from.
I also read that the added thrust from the modified exhaust could provide up to an extra 10 mph in top speed but the addition of wing mounted pylons negated some of this. Speed was increased to 394 mph at 21,800 feet, an improvement of 6 mph in pre-production machines. But like you said, this could only be attained by aircraft under strict testing parameters and not by those in the field.