Never saw one before today. Interesting History.

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Think I will see if I can acquire the Resin kit, but it will be a stash queen for quite awhile as I am not yet ready to attempt an entire resin kit! But thanks for the heads up from everyone about the kits, she is a clean looking aircraft! Remarkable to me how much like a hybrid graft between a P-51 and P-40 she appears to be.
 
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, after years of pushing the P40 its makers had to admit the P51 was better and make a P40 that looked like a P51.

Looked like a P-51 and used a laminar flow wing like a P-51.
 
Looked like a P-51 and used a laminar flow wing like a P-51.
But I suspect the resemblance is just at first glance. Those pods for the landing gear dont look very "laminar flow" and I doubt that the chin radiator had close to zero cooling drag.
 
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, after years of pushing the P40 its makers had to admit the P51 was better and make a P40 that looked like a P51.
More like Curtiss having so much blind faith in that design, but realizing it could still be improved on.
A little whittling here and there, an engine upgrade (...I think...) and what they ended up with was like a P-51.
...not to take anything away from the rest of the P-40 line, but yeah, that "Q" version had to be a cold slap in the face for them.


Elvis
 
Last edited:

I disagree, it merely looks like a P51. The P40 series were great aircraft but were of their time, a pre war design. You can only tweak a design so far and in my opinion the P40Q was just a tweak too far, it was never put into production because it simply wasnt as good as the P51 D/H. The P51 (or Mustang) was specifically designed and ordered to be better than the P40. This new design was from the ground up using technology and ideas not available to the original design of the P40. Hawkers could have tried making a Hurricane look more like a Spitfire but it wouldnt be a Spitfire because underneath the base design (and philosophy) was different. They had to make the Typhoon and then the Tempest to produce a better design, and even then that is arguable. 1944/45 saw the peak of piston engined warplanes, a few designs continued due to the difficulty of getting jets to take off and land from carriers.

The cut down rear fuselage, bubble canopy, clean lines and laminar flow wings were common in late war designs. However the P40Q wasnt cleaner than a P51, its cooling system and its landing gear pods were "draggy", it therefore was not as good as planes in production so why order it?
 
pbehn,

Thank you for putting that in my face.
It should've read "...and what they ended up with was like a P-51.".
Apologies for the typo. I've corrected the post.


Elvis
 
Same Alison that powered the rest of them, but a different version that was never used on prior variations.


Here's a linky to the full article - Curtiss XP-40Q Fighter



Elvis
 

Users who are viewing this thread