P51A

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

rogerwilko

Airman 1st Class
102
14
Mar 5, 2009
If you go to wikipedia under mustangs this picture blows up huge to show a smiling pilot. No wonder! Wonder what his name is (was)?
P-51A_zps822acbf0.jpg
 
I know this is going to sound pedantic, but its an early P-51 as opposed to P-51A. The first Mustangs the USAAC received were diverted from RAF Mustang IA production batch and were designated NA-91 by the manufacturer, but simply P-51 by the Army. A number were fitted with cameras and became F-6s. The P-51A differed in the armament fit in that it had four .50s in the wings, not the cannon as this one clearly has. Nice picture. The wiki caption confirms this: "P-51 Mustang on a test flight, October 1942; this particular aircraft (41-37416?) may have been allocated to the RAF as a Mustang 1A."
 
The first NA-91s that the USAAC acquired, had the 4 20mm Hispano cannon with the cowl armament deleted (like this photo suggests) and were only 150 units. Once the USAAF took over, these NA-91s were redesignated P-51 Apache.
 
The aircraft has absolutely no tail number or specific identifiers at all. How is this even legal?
 
The first NA-91s that the USAAC acquired, had the 4 20mm Hispano cannon with the cowl armament deleted (like this photo suggests) and were only 150 units. Once the USAAF took over, these NA-91s were redesignated P-51 Apache.

Despite the US ordering 150 of them, only 57 actually went to the USAAC, the other 93 went to the RAF as Mustang IAs and of the 57, 55 were F-6A recon aircraft. The remaining two became XP-78s, the original US designation of the Merlin engined Mustang and were later redesignated XP-51Bs. These were fitted with British Merlin 61s and were the first American Merlin engined Mustangs, although the British flew a Merlin engined Mustang before the Americans. The name Apache was assigned to the A-36 dive bomber. The A-36 was the first Mustang variant to go into US service.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back