Potential China military base in Solomons

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

China money is said running out.

The government maybe, but the Belt and Road policy also relies heavily on proxy wealthy individuals who act on behalf of the CCP to further Chinese interests.

"She also stressed the importance of allowing companies and the market to determine what to do, as economic viability holds the key to their success."

From here: an article that stresses international cooperation in fulfilling the initiative.


This is informative, if not a bit propagandistic. Useful for an insight into Chinese policy thinking.

 
Slightly off-topic but related:


A Philippine supply boat collided on Sunday with a China Coast Guard vessel attempting to block it during an operation to resupply the grounded LST BRP Sierra Madre (LS57) at Second Thomas Shoal in the disputed Spratly Islands.
A Philippine Coast Guard patrol vessel was also bumped by a Chinese Maritime Militia during the mission, according to a Sunday statement from the Philippines' National Task Force for the West Philippine Sea.

The incident occurred at 6:04 a.m., according to the statement, which blamed China Coast Guard Vessel 5203's blocking maneuvers for a collision with the Armed Forces of the Philippines-contracted resupply boat Unaiza May 2 at approximately 13.5 nautical miles east-northeast of the Sierra Madre.

"The provocative, irresponsible, and illegal action of CCGV 5203 imperiled the safety of the crew of Unaiza May 2," read the statement.

During the resupply mission, Philippine Coast Guard patrol vessel BRP Cabra (MRRV-4409)'s port side was bumped by Chinese Maritime Militia vessel 00003 at 8:14 a.m. while it was lying approximately 6.4 nm northeast of Second Thomas Shoal, according to the statement. The resupply mission was still ongoing, the statement added, with Unaiza May 1 successfully resupplying the Sierra Madre and personnel stationed there.

"The National Task Force for the West Philippine Sea (NTF-WPS) condemns in the strongest degree the latest dangerous, irresponsible, and illegal actions of the CCG and the Chinese Maritime Militia done this morning, in violation of Philippine sovereignty, sovereign rights and jurisdiction and in utter blatant disregard of the United Nations Charter, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGS) and relevant international maritime conventions, and the 2016 Arbitral Award" concluded the statement.


The USN just retired the USS Mobile Bay (CG-53), bet the Philippine Navy could use that to "bump" back...
 
Is USS Wisconsin available?
Nope, besides, a Tichonderoga class cruiser would be perfect for "bumping" a Chinese Coastguard ship (more like bitch-slapping) unlike a Battlewagon, which would plow them under and grind their corpses.

Which would be preferable, but most certainly over the top in the media and public opinion's eyes.
 
The government maybe, but the Belt and Road policy also relies heavily on proxy wealthy individuals who act on behalf of the CCP to further Chinese interests.

"She also stressed the importance of allowing companies and the market to determine what to do, as economic viability holds the key to their success."

From here: an article that stresses international cooperation in fulfilling the initiative.


This is informative, if not a bit propagandistic. Useful for an insight into Chinese policy thinking.

A nation's or politician's eloquence is always false.
Asians know this well too.
 
From the latest Economist. Click to enlarge.

IMG_2743.png
 
Last edited:
Militarily speaking, it looks like their military is kneecapped by corruption.

I'll be surprised if their aircraft carrier Fujian enters fully operational service with functional EMALS before 2030.

 
Militarily speaking, it looks like their military is kneecapped by corruption.

I'll be surprised if their aircraft carrier Fujian enters fully operational service with functional EMALS before 2030.

Good assumption. Other than that, what the hell did they build it for anyway ?
 
Good assumption. Other than that, what the hell did they build it for anyway ?
Same reason the South Americans wanted dreadnoughts, everyone else has one. But with everyone else in the Indo-Pacific except the USA, from the Indians, Japanese, Australians and Thais, is making due with STOBAR or VSTOL flattops of various sizes (I assume that's why the Canberra class LHD have ski jumps); Beijing wants something that betters than them all, a CATOBAR carrier, and actually the world's only non-nuclear powered CATOBAR carrier - though that's no boast. If it wasn't for its parsimonious Exchequer, Britain's QE class could have been in this category too.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back