Potential China military base in Solomons

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

The other real problem for the Chinese carrier is the new magnetic catapult system which was built to a theory which
has the problem in that it doesn't work.
I assumed they'd tapped into the Chinese diaspora or other embedded spies to steal the USA tech.

But now I read that Chinese EMALS uses a different tech? Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System - Wikipedia

China developed an electromagnetic catapult system in the 2000s for aircraft carriers, but with a different technical approach. Chinese adopted a medium-voltage, direct current (DC) power transmission system,[47] instead of the alternating current catapult system that United States developed.[48][49]
 
Wikipedia says that China's new carrier is powered by steam turbines. If this is true, wouldn't the smarter move be to utilize traditional, well-established steam catapults? But why would they use steam turbines? Gas turbines have been the norm for sixty years.
 
Wikipedia says that China's new carrier is powered by steam turbines. If this is true, wouldn't the smarter move be to utilize traditional, well-established steam catapults? But why would they use steam turbines? Gas turbines have been the norm for sixty years.

Wouldn't gas turbines this large be enormous fuel hogs?
 
SYDNEY — Voting started Friday in the tiny Pacific island nation of Tuvalu, in a national election that could reverberate from China to Australia.

With just over 11,500 people, Tuvalu is one of the smallest nations in the world, but the election for the 16-seat parliament was being closely watched. After the vote count, parliamentary negotiations will form a new government and elect the prime minister. Polls opened at 8 a.m. and were to close at 4 p.m.

Prime Minister Kausea Natano is running again, but even reelection to parliament won't guarantee him the top post.

Finance Minister Seve Paeniu is challenging him, and opposition leader Enele Sopoaga is hoping to again be prime minister, after losing out to Natano after the 2019 election.

The elections come as China, the United States and others wrangle for influence in the strategically crucial region.

Tuvalu, a British colony until 1978, is one of only 12 countries that have official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, the self-governing democratic island that China claims as its own territory.

But China has been pushing those Taiwan allies to switch their alliance. Natano has so far rebuffed Beijing, but that could change after this election. Nauru, another small Pacific nation, recently switched its support from Taiwan to China.

Paeniu has said he wants to review Tuvalu's relationships with both Taiwan and China.



History rhymes ...
 
The two active Chinese carriers are steam turbines and the one soon to be commissiones is also a steam turbine design.

As I recall, the two current ones have an endurance of about a month and a half at sea before requiring refueling.
 

SYDNEY, Jan 27 (Reuters) - The pro-Taiwan leader of the Pacific Islands nation of Tuvalu, Kausea Natano, lost his seat in an election closely watched by Taiwan, China and the U.S., results showed on Saturday.
Tuvalu, with a population of about 11,200 spread across nine islands, is one of three remaining Pacific allies of Taiwan, after Nauru cut ties this month and switched to Beijing, which had promised more development help.

Natano had pledged to continue support for Taiwan, a diplomatic ally since 1979. Another leadership contender, Seve Paeniu, has said diplomatic ties should be reviewed, with the new government deciding whether Taiwan or China can best respond to Tuvalu's needs.
The diplomatic tussle between Taiwan and China comes amid a wider contest for influence in the Pacific between China and the U.S., with Washington recently pledging the first submarine cable to connect Tuvalu to global telecommunications.

Results for the electorate of Funafuti released on Saturday by an election official on Tuvalu TV showed Natano did not retain his seat. He could not immediately be reached for comment.


 
and underestimates Japan when Japan is the largest sponsor for the US Forces in overseas. It was more than the half of total costs in 2004 IIRC.
The Japanese navy is highly rated as well.

145 vessels all up with around a third being what would be termed blue water.

Modern as they come as well.

Japanese planning for the next class starts when the current class is being built. Instead
of waiting a decade or more and trying to update what they have Japan is ready to start building
a whole new type.

Coupled with US assets and the advent of the F35 (Japan is buying 199), there isn't another navy
who would be wanting to start a fight in the area (at least if it is run by sane leadership).
 
The Japanese navy is highly rated as well.

145 vessels all up with around a third being what would be termed blue water.

Modern as they come as well.

Japanese planning for the next class starts when the current class is being built. Instead
of waiting a decade or more and trying to update what they have Japan is ready to start building
a whole new type.

Coupled with US assets and the advent of the F35 (Japan is buying 199), there isn't another navy
who would be wanting to start a fight in the area (at least if it is run by sane leadership).
I wish we here in Canada could do this. Instead we build a class of warships, like the dozen Halifax class frigates, and then we refuse any further orders, the yards close down and/or consolidate, laying off thousands of skilled workers who readily leave for skilled jobs elsewhere, with the rump of the remaining industry scraping a living on maintenance work or making OPVs. And then, twenty-seven years after the last Halifax class frigate enters service, when we want to build the next class of large warships, like the fifteen (reportedly) Type-26 frigates we have to start almost from scratch, finding new skilled labour, re-opening or expanding yards, etc. Instead, Canada should always have 1-3 large warships in production.
 
I wish we here in Canada could do this. Instead we build a class of warships, like the dozen Halifax class frigates, and then we refuse any further orders, the yards close down and/or consolidate, laying off thousands of skilled workers who readily leave for skilled jobs elsewhere, with the rump of the remaining industry scraping a living on maintenance work or making OPVs. And then, twenty-seven years after the last Halifax class frigate enters service, when we want to build the next class of large warships, like the fifteen (reportedly) Type-26 frigates we have to start almost from scratch, finding new skilled labour, re-opening or expanding yards, etc. Instead, Canada should always have 1-3 large warships in production.
Avoiding this sort of situation is what Australia is doing with a continuous shipbuilding program and related - see:

 
Avoiding this sort of situation is what Australia is doing with a continuous shipbuilding program and related - see:

Very relevant document for the future security of the whole region. Australia also has clearance for the refurbishment of turbine engines
such as the Abrams tank unit. Otherwise it would be a matter of months to send and get one back. It also takes the pressure off US
repair facilities.

In 2023 the USN started planning with Japan to use Japanese facilities to repair USN ships rather than sending them backwards and forwards
to the US yards.
 
Avoiding this sort of situation is what Australia is doing with a continuous shipbuilding program and related - see:

Thanks for sharing that. Australia seems to know what they're doing, at least compared to Canada.

Here's a quick summary I've made of the state of Canadian warship construction. The second column of the bottom chart should be titled DD/FG/OPV built, as at at least the Kingston class and Harry DeWolf classes gave the industry some RCN construction work. Nonetheless, all but two of our eight warship-capable shipyards have permanently closed down, the last in 2003 after completing nine of the Halifax class, and then being starved of any further naval construction. And just look at the massive, multiyear pauses where no warships are constructed whatsoever, where the skilled employees will have left for new jobs and industries elsewhere.

ships.jpg


Speaking of China, we have no shipyards on the Pacific Coast capable of constructing warships, nor outside of CFB Esquimalt, of refitting warships. It's no wonder that Pacific Canada feels they're getting shafted by a federal government that desperately wants to please Quebecers and Atlantic Canada with pork, but none for them.
 
Last edited:
In 2023 the USN started planning with Japan to use Japanese facilities to repair USN ships rather than sending them backwards and forwards
to the US yards.
Japanese government will pay all costs.
This is a rare good opportunity for the japanese nationalists to expand the military capability no matter how much costs they owe now.
They will control the alliance itself sooner or later. The US had better pay for herself as my honest advice.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back