Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Are we talking new A-10s for the USAF? Or for sales abroad? The A-10C is currently being done for the former and likely engine upgrade will follow (A-10D?). If I recall correctly the A-10C is being rewinged (new wing box) and will include various avionics/mission system upgrades (comm, target designators, etc.).
Wheels - you're example is a poster child of why ISO-9000 is a sham. I can't believe why industry allowed itself to embrace this, but then again, it is a great excuse to raise prices at the end of the day for something that is totally useless to begin with!
Oh yea, you do get a fancy certificate!
I'd definately keep the AP round for anti-armor and hard hitting missions. Nothing can really compare to a little lovin' from a warthog...
I was referring to switching to HE for the COIN role, for conventional deployments we'd still keep the uranium rounds in production.
HE with airburst would be incredible against lighter, more spread out targets.
Good to hear, I've looked for what ammunition is produced in 30x173 and I wasn't able to find any reference to anything but Uranium AP rounds. That was a while ago, I found it just now.HEI is the dominant round of choice for the A-10's in Afghanistan
I wish I knew why industry embraced it but it doesn't seem to be on its way out.
I've heard from some people who I knew at the companies that they are having trouble with their production lines now.
Their IS0 9000 certified companies aren't meeting the BP specifications and I didn't give them all my trade secrets.
Some of the products took me over 5 years of trial and error to learn how to run consistently with all of the "Off Blueprint" requirements they kept adding to the parts.
Most of them only documented fully on my end.
For what I went through trying to meet their a**inine requirements I feel no sympathy for them.
I called it quits before I finished but that would have been the only thing I got out of the experience.
Wheels
Good to hear, I've looked for what ammunition is produced in 30x173 and I wasn't able to find any reference to anything but Uranium AP rounds. That was a while ago, I found it just now.
I don't think so, because I heard that planes with round emblems on them were slower.
I read that too, maybe. In a book.
Hm, needs to be "spookier" if you know what I mean.If someone was going to bring back any WWII vintage kite into production, I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't a C-47!
Basler Turbo Conversions, LLC* Basler Turbo 67 Aircraft
They modernize them, but don't build them from scratch as far as I'm aware.
Even some non-(extensively) mod examples are in use still, here and there.
want to talk about reverse engineering? try putting the R-2800 back into production.Problem with the A-10 production is the DA is Northrop and our stupid contracts always has the manufacturer destroying the jigs after production is finalized so no jigs = expensive reverse engineering
The P-47 (F-47) would be produced without the turbo and its weight and ducting making it lighter with room for fuel/armor and instead of 8 x .50s you would have two podded GEPOD 30s (same ammo as A-10) or maybe just produce the A1E again