RAF Bomber Code system...

Discussion in 'Aircraft Requests' started by plan_D, Jul 6, 2005.

  1. plan_D

    plan_D Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    11,985
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    ...how did it work?

    The picture attached is a Wellington with the squadron code of 'KW' - 'KW' however refers to 615 (County of Surrey) Sqn. which was never equipped with Wellingtons - it was in the CBI with Hurricanes, Spitfires then Thunderbolts.

    Obviously Bomber Command...or is that Coastal Command...had a different system...can someone explain please...and oh yeah, tell me what squadron the Wellington is from?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. evangilder

    evangilder "Shooter"
    Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2004
    Messages:
    19,419
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Network Engineer/Photographer
    Location:
    Moorpark, CA
    Home Page:
    From what I can tell, 5 squadrons used the fuselage code of KW!

    615 flying P-47, Hurricane, Spitfire

    267 flying Lysander, Hudson, Anson, Lodestar

    47 flying Wellington, Mosquito, Beaufort

    615 flying Gladiator

    425 flying Wellington, Halifax, Lancaster

    You would have to look at the individual units to see which one it was, either the 425 or 47.
     
  3. plan_D

    plan_D Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    11,985
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    4 Squadrons, you listed 615 Sqn. twice. 615 Sqn. had Gladiators at the start of World War II.

    But still... :confused: :cry:
     
  4. evangilder

    evangilder "Shooter"
    Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2004
    Messages:
    19,419
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Network Engineer/Photographer
    Location:
    Moorpark, CA
    Home Page:
    Whoops, you're right. Sorry, I posted before I had enough coffee! ;) If you need more info, I can look and see what I have.
     
  5. plan_D

    plan_D Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    11,985
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Please do...I officially declare I dislike the RAF coding system... :cry:
     
  6. evangilder

    evangilder "Shooter"
    Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2004
    Messages:
    19,419
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Network Engineer/Photographer
    Location:
    Moorpark, CA
    Home Page:
    It certainly left a lot to be desired. Multiple squadrons using the same codes did not help the situation!
     
  7. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    it wasn't that bad!
     
  8. Maestro

    Maestro Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2004
    Messages:
    2,890
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Occupation:
    Security Officer
    Location:
    Beaupré, Province of Québec, Canada
    If only they were not using the same code to designate two fighter or two bomber squadrons, it would be just fine.

    I mean, if a fighter with "KW" on his tail crash in a field, you know it is from the 615 Squadron. But if it is a bomber, you have the choice between three squadrons. It would have been better if only one fighter and one bomber squadron had the same code.
     
  9. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    it wasn't that bad :lol:

    it would be easy to tell what aircraft it was, it'd have the serial number on the tail, and they didn't actually have the same code at the same time, they were often changed in some cases, which i believe is what happened here.........
     
  10. Concorde247

    Concorde247 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Messages:
    399
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    LONDON
    Home Page:
    It is MUCH better for the sake of accuracy, if you can trace an aircraft by its serial number or the crews names, rather than by just its code letters, for as soon as an aircraft was lost in a squadron, then when it was replaced, the same code was more often than not, put on the replacement aircraft, you can see that on the following website where there could be twenty aircraft with the same code letters but with all different serial numbers, There were also some instances in bomber command where aircraft were transferred from squadron to squadron, but the code letters werent changed to the new squadrons codes straight away. and if the aircraft was lost in action as sometimes happened, the wrong squadron code was put against the squadron number losses. This also adds to the difficulty.

    http://www.bomber-command.info/codlnk.htm

    Things can also be made difficult when researching US aircraft as well, as they sometimes made one machine out of two!!
    :rolleyes:
     
  11. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,349
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    Interesting! 8)
     
  12. Concorde247

    Concorde247 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Messages:
    399
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    LONDON
    Home Page:
    IF the wellington shown in the photo has the serial number of "BJ864"

    Then here are its details:

    Wellington Mk III of 425 Squadron RCAF

    Serial number BJ864 coded KW-E took off from Dishforth on the night of
    11/12-11-1942 on a gardening mission, but crashed 21:30 after several unsuccessful landing attempts on the south side of the airfield at lacon hill
    in yorkshire.

    as far as my database shows all crew were KIA. :(
     
  13. plan_D

    plan_D Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    11,985
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Serves them right for gardening during war time. :rolleyes:
     
  14. mosquitoman

    mosquitoman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,990
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Occupation:
    student
    Location:
    Saffron Walden/Sheffield
    Home Page:
    Gardening=minelaying
    Different areas of sea were different "plots"
     
  15. plan_D

    plan_D Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    11,985
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    "Serves them right for gardening during war time." = Joke
     
  16. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    wait, so, when bombers went on a milk run, they weren't actually collecting milk :shcok:

    i was wondering waht they'd do with 14,000lbs of milk :rolleyes:
     
  17. mosquitoman

    mosquitoman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,990
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Occupation:
    student
    Location:
    Saffron Walden/Sheffield
    Home Page:
    I guessed it was a joke, it's just that not everybody would understand
     
  18. Pisis

    Pisis Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2004
    Messages:
    5,925
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Praga Mater Urbium
    hi plan_D,

    i bet the depicted wellie is from (probably) 309 polish sqdn, since nos 310, 312 and 313 were Czechoslovak fighter squadrons and the only Cs bomber sqdn flying wellies was no. 311 sqdn and they had KX codes.

    damn, i had all the used marking site url in my favorites but lost it during reinstall of windows...
     
  19. Pisis

    Pisis Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2004
    Messages:
    5,925
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Praga Mater Urbium
    so no, ain't a polish unit as well, no poles were marked like this... 8, 9, 12, 14, 15, 24, 36, 37 38, 40, 57, 69, 70, 75, 93, 99, 101, 103, 104, 115, 142, 148, 149, 150, 156, 158, 162, 166, 172, 179, 192, 196, 199, 203, 214, 215, 218, 221, 232, 242, 244, 300, 301, 304, 305, 311, 405, 407, 415, 419, 420, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 431, 432, 458, 460, 466, 524, 544, 547, 612, 621... :lol: all these sdns flew wellies

    we can scratch out those from 300-311, these were czech and polish
     
  20. plan_D

    plan_D Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    11,985
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    It's either 425 or 47 squadron, I've only got that far.
     
Loading...

Share This Page