Real vs. models

Discussion in 'Modeling' started by Pisis, Sep 29, 2005.

  1. Pisis

    Pisis Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2004
    Messages:
    5,925
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Praga Mater Urbium
  2. Lou IV

    Lou IV New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Occupation:
    tech
    (Real aircraft manufacturers demanding royalties from model companies such as Revell, Monogram, Airfix, etc. for likenesses of their products)

    Not interesting - sad!

    Yes, this fight has been going on for some time now. Unfortunately a sign of the times when "money is king".

    I think the model companies have a good point -that they don't owe the aircraft manufacturers a penny since government contractors are paid with taxpayer money to develop their designs for the good of the country.

    At this time some model kits are licensed, some are not. Same goes for decals. Finescale Modeler had a recent article about this and how much the licensing actually adds to the cost of the model. I don't recall the amount, but I'm pretty sure it was less than one US dollar.

    There were problems with airliner models in the 80's as well. Boeing was demanding royalities and threatening to sue. Result: model kits on shelves with "Boeing" crossed out or missing altogether! Also airlines vs. decals (even defunct airlines). In contrast it was rumoured that Airbus actually paid Airfix to make a model of the A-300!

    Still, I think it's absurd. It's a hobby. It's a MODEL of an F-15, not a real F-15.

    I think most modelers are not millionaires, and most plastic model manufacturers are not Fortune 500 companies (correct me if I'm wrong). If anything, people want to build a model of something because they admire it, not because they want to make bootleg copies of it and sell it.

    What's next - a license from the manufacturer of the aircraft weapons, tires, lights, paint and windows as well?

    Glad I'm fairly well "stocked up" with model kits right now!

    . . . just an excuse to legally extort money from people. Very, very sad.
     
  3. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    yeah i quite enjoy models myself, whilst i don't live in america i would be pretty annoyed if i had to pay more beacuse of this, i make the models because i admire the planes, i mean people younger than me (i'm 15) make these models it's not fair on them or any of us...........
     
  4. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,349
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    Pretty retarded, a six year old doesnt make F-15's to sell them does he...Unless he's a particularly smart 6 year old with Entrepreneur aspirations...
     
  5. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    but even if he does sell them on he's not doing the defence industry any harm is he............
     
  6. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,349
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    Quite the opposite...could inspire many people to join up...
     
  7. me262

    me262 Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2005
    Messages:
    271
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    that is bull s***!!!!
    we are doing them a favor by showing the hardware they have.
    the they will have to pay US ( of we) for the adversaitment
    what do you think?
     
  8. evangilder

    evangilder "Shooter"
    Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2004
    Messages:
    19,419
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Network Engineer/Photographer
    Location:
    Moorpark, CA
    Home Page:
    To quote my English friends, it's a load of bollocks.
     
  9. Nonskimmer

    Nonskimmer Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    8,848
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Occupation:
    Naval Electronics Technician
    Location:
    Halifax, Nova Scotia
    Personally I think they're full of sh*t, that's what I think. But then again I'm no legal eagle. :rolleyes:

    Computer game developers have been going through this for a while (Pacific Fighters anyone?) with warplanes that have been out of production for decades. Grumman for one apparently wants royalties for the use of planes such as the Avenger, Wildcat, and Hellcat in computer games.
     
  10. evangilder

    evangilder "Shooter"
    Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2004
    Messages:
    19,419
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Network Engineer/Photographer
    Location:
    Moorpark, CA
    Home Page:
    Ridiculous! My reply to that: :fist: :tool: :thefinger:
     
  11. Nonskimmer

    Nonskimmer Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    8,848
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Occupation:
    Naval Electronics Technician
    Location:
    Halifax, Nova Scotia
    They've finally figured out that there's actually money to be made there. Flight sims are growing in popularity again, and model planes have been popular forever. Quite honestly, I wonder what took them so long to pull this kind of stuff. Not that I'm pleased about it. Believe me, I'm not. :confused:
     
  12. evangilder

    evangilder "Shooter"
    Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2004
    Messages:
    19,419
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Network Engineer/Photographer
    Location:
    Moorpark, CA
    Home Page:
    I don't understand the sudden greediness of these manufacturers. Since it was US tax dollars that bought and paid for the building of these aircraft, perhaps they should pay us for promoting these. Now, if they were taking that money and dropping it into history and aviation museums, it might be okay. I am wondering when they might start charging a licensing fee for flying the airplanes at airshows.

    Greedy dickheads.
     
Loading...

Share This Page