- Thread starter
- #1,161
Shortround6
Major General
There was quite a difference between perception and reality.If you read Lundstrom's 3 volumes on the 1942 airwar (First Team and Black Shoe...) in the Pacific, you'll note that he assessed the 5in/38 as ineffective as an AA weapon. Medium calibre AA, without VT ammo was just too inaccurate, for a variety of reasons. to be of much use against aircraft. It did have a deterrent value, though.
OTOH, the USN BuOrd claimed massive numbers of AA kills in 1942 including many 5in/38 kills but the vast majority of these claims cannot be verified via IJN records.
The US believed they had the best AA suite in the world, they did, it just was nowhere near as good as they thought in combat. A US Destroyers with 5 guns putting 10-12 black puff balls into the sky per minute per barrel (50-60 per ship) was certainly more impressive looking than the amount of puff balls the Japanese destroyers could make and compared to some the UK destroyers with one 4in gun making 10-12 puff balls per ship the deterrence might have been significant.
UK destroyers could put up a number of puff balls over other ships but with 40 degrees of elevation they couldn't do much for themselves.
The real trick was getting those puff balls to actual damage the enemy aircraft.
I may have my own definition of "medium caliber AA"
I tend to call all of the 5in to 3in guns heavy AA which does cover quite a span.
I ignore the over 5in stuff although plenty of navies built high elevating 5.5 to 8in guns (Some British 8in would elevate to 70 degrees?) as their chances were not good due to training issues (training as in actually pointing the guns at the targets) and firing rates. Even Swordfish could cover 2/3 of a mile between shots.
Japanese special AA ammo for 14-16in guns show desire but actual effectiveness???
I call the 55mm and down to about 27/28mm medium AA and the 25mm and under light AA.
The Medium requires more in the way of mounts, deck reinforcement, crew, ammo handling etc.
The US 1.1 (28mm) weighed about 4.7 tons and 6.25 tons per mount. It was never used as a triple, twin or single (unless some enterprising crew welded together their own mount)
The Hotchkiss 25mm is sort of neither fish nor fowl. It could be single mounted on a pintile mount or used in twin/triple mounts with geared elevation and traverse.
It wasn't much more capable than the 20mm Oerlikon overall or even as good. 250gram shell offset by low rate of fire.