In combat 57 times, or just over one a month on average, kinda backs up the fruitless sweeps statement.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
In combat 57 times, or just over one a month on average, kinda backs up the fruitless sweeps statement.57 missions or 57 enemy encounters?
I'm talking about long range fighter sweeps, I have a report on 610 squadron mentioning how excited they were to fly over German, years after everyone else had been doing even though the aux tanks and drop tanks were approved for the spit. http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/610-ORB-1sept44.jpgSo the story as you are telling it is nonsense and doesn't fit the facts. Time to go back and reread the book.
There have been pilots who flew hundreds of "missions" and saw little to no combat where an enemy was engaged so I still don't understand where you're coming from.In combat 57 times, or just over one a month on average, kinda backs up the fruitless sweeps statement.
So 57 enemy encounters in 200 operations (missions?), 34 claims. Sounds about average (or even better then average) when comparing to other allied aces who were given leave during the course of the war.Hi
According to 'Wing Leader', at the end of Chapter 18, when he left to go onto Spitfire XIVs he states that in his previous Spitfire IX "... during the previous twelve months, had carried me on nearly 200 operations." The book 'Aces High' by Shores and Williams, pages 357-358, has JEJ with claims of 34 and 7 shared destroyed, 3 and 7 shared probables, 10 and 3 shared damaged. He also of course flew with the USAF in the Korean War during 1950-51 while on an exchange tour (from 1948).
Mike
So a Spit could travel 1000 miles plus.We are getting off topic a bit, could the Spitfire fill the role as an escort fighter, the answer is yes out to around 500 miles, did it, no, why, no idea, RAF stubbornness?.
It would have to have a Range (straight line optimal cruise) of 1700-2000 mi (with combined Interna/Externals for 500mi combat radius and 20 min of MP/WEP combat. For a 500 mi radius after combat it would need more than 120 gal internal fuel remaining - to cruise bac and have a 20-30minreserve.So a Spit could travel 1000 miles plus.
He was a hell of a pilot, he shot down a lot of 190's, not doubting that, problem is the RAF had many pilots like him flying the Spitfire that could have made a major contribution to the daylight bombing compain ''IF'' they were given the chance.
A BoB pilot commented that even during the Battle of Britain most of the pilots most of the time were not involved in combat. Many were stationed outside of the LW range, there were days without any ops and even on a raid Park put up a screen of patrols to cover possibilities, obviously many of these never saw the enemy. There were also a few standing patrols, rarely mentioned because they rarely saw anything.Why is that a problem? Almost all RAF pilots were "given the chance" at combat during WWII.
Not all, but a very good percent. I'm sure some of the instructors would like to have flown combat, but somebody has to jeep the new pilot supply train going. Somebody has to fly transports / liaison / clandestine special missions / etc. Somebody has to fly bombers, IF you are bombing. That leaves a cadre to fly fighters, and they were hard-pressed to keep a sufficient supply of fighter pilots at times, especially early-on.
That being the case, what Spitfire pilots are you talking about that didn't get the chance? If they were flying Spitfires and didn't get the chance at combat, I am assuming they were assigned to places where the Germans didn't attack, but might have, and so had to be covered by fighters. Is that it?
We are getting off topic a bit, could the Spitfire fill the role as an escort fighter, the answer is yes out to around 500 miles, did it, no, why, no idea, RAF stubbornness?.
Well they werent far wrong as far as the RAF were concerned. They didnt have anything to escort during the day. The numbers British industry could make would not be sufficient to provide a L/R escort in the required numbers and in terms of quality not numbers the Me 262 was contemporary with the P-51D. Spitfires did assist a lot in the early days, but for the RAF to escort to and from the target on long range missions needs a whole lot more Spitfires, but the Spitfire wasnt as good as the P-51B/C D, so better for the RAF to operate those which is what they did.There was no such a doctrine/requirement by the RAF.
When the topic of long-range fighters was brought out mid-war, dogma was that a LR fighter will be inferior to a short range fighter, thus not worth it.
1 - Well they werent far wrong as far as the RAF were concerned. They didnt have anything to escort during the day. 2 - The numbers British industry could make would not be sufficient to provide a L/R escort in the required numbers and in terms of quality not numbers the Me 262 was contemporary with the P-51D. Spitfires did assist a lot in the early days, but for the RAF to escort to and from the target on long range missions needs a whole lot more Spitfires, but the Spitfire wasnt as good as the P-51B/C D, so better for the RAF to operate those which is what they did.
Unsure, but I have heard different figures in manuals evenThe extra 0.5 could be in the lines?
That is pretty strange, I do remember seeing proposals to put larger fuel tanks in there including someWhat's silly is there is enough room for double that but the space wasn't used, look at the diagram, heaps of space for more fuel. View attachment 665688
I agree completely. Dowding had to both husband his resources and ensure that the whole of the south and east coasts were protected. My point was that even in what is considered a fairly long and intense battle most spent most of the time at readiness or on patrol, training, reforming etc. A bit like I have read of infantry soldiers life 99% boredom 1% homicidal terrifying madness.Hi pbehn,
People can ALWAYS look back at a battle or a war and see where things might have been done differently to better overall effect. Not intimating you are one of them. These same people would likely never make those decisions in real time, without the knowledge of what would soon come to pass, but they now know 70 years after the events happened. Hindsight always has 20-20 vision. How many would commit ALL the Spitfire pilots at once back then, leaving no reserves, and if they were shot down somehow, lose the entire country's fighter air arm and possibly the entire war?
The guys who ran the war ran it with the resources they had and could generally develop during the war. They didn't know, in advance that they could, for instance, not build the Lancaster at all and instead make a huge force of Mosquitoes, as had been suggested in here several times. They made their decisions based upon maximum likelihood of national survival at present and in the near, foreseeable future and, in the case of the real world, did a pretty damned good job of it --- they won.
The Spitfire pilots who weren't engaged in the real fighting were "the reserves" that would be sorely needed, and needed quickly, if the BOB and a few other early events had not gone as well as they did. I'll say that, in my opinion, the British / Allied planners did about as well as they could with the information they had and the resources they had to work with. Heck, even the Normandy invasion wasn't without potentially disastrous weather possibilities, and Eisenhower received about as much advice to postpone it as he did to go through with it. In the end, he made a good decision with fewer casualties than could reasonably be expected had even a small number of things gone the way the Germans wanted them to go.
I'm guessing that many of the Spitfire pilots who missed out in the BOB and other early actions didn't miss out for the rest of the war. If they did, then that is another story that I haven't seen investigated in here as yet.
Maybe another thread on the subject?
Cheers!
Sorry I thought we were discussing long range escort, how far did Battles and Blenheim's fly to get to the Ardennes? The RAF couldnt get air superiority over Dieppe in 1942 so maybe they were wise not to get involved in a long range daylight bombing campaign?1 - Who was supposed to provide the escort for Battles and Blenheims above Ardenes (or anywhere) in 1940? Escort to the Wellingtons trying to attack KM assets? Escort over Africa and Med? Bomber Command's doctrine was to attack during daylingt (since the bomber will always get through), before Luftwaffe made them reconsider. So there was certainly enough of stuff to escort.
2 - Hurricanes were produced into 1944. 1000+ Defiants was produced. Blenheims in many hundreds past 1940. Lets introduce a biplane fighter in 1937, and produce it in 740+ copies. Botha - 580 examples. I can understand the 1st 500 Battles, even the 1st 1000 - but more than 2000, all with Merlins?? So yes, with hundreds of clunkers on the production lines, there was certainly not enough capacity left to make more Spitfires or other over-performers.
Not having 200 imp gals of internal fuel on day one on the Typhoons, Tempests and Spitfire 14s is AM's/RAF's idea.
Me 262 vs. P-51D is a red herring. There were years of air war well before Luftwaffe was able to get 50, let alone 100 of 262s in the air.
Everyone was entitled on mistakes and missing opportunities. Not having a day fighter with 500 mile escort footprint was British AM's missed opportunity.
Read the report I posted on 610 Squadron, they flew 800 miles and back with 50-60G of fuel remaining, obviously combat will shorten that distance but they didn't use leading edge tanks either so it's possible.So a Spit could travel 1000 miles plus.
He was a very good pilot, he used to stretch his squadron out line abreast for over a mile or more hunting for enemy aircraft, everything I have read about him shows he was keen for combat, very well liked by his fellow pilots also. All up over 700 missions but like posted earlier he injured himself which kept him out of action for a while.So 57 enemy encounters in 200 operations (missions?), 34 claims. Sounds about average (or even better then average) when comparing to other allied aces who were given leave during the course of the war.