The airplane that did the most to turn the tide of the war.

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Resp:
Duly noted.
Tell that to the French people/the Germans on June 5/6 1944 when paratroopers landed at Normandy, and in Burma 1944 when the Chindits needed supplies. l believe we were speaking of significant aircraft contributions.

I think by 5/6 June 1944, the tide had already definitely turned for Germany. The case for the Chindits might be stronger on the Burma front but not from a wider Japanese strategic perspective.
 
As far as we are wandering off topic with Liberty Ships, part of the issue was solved in the Victory Ships by increasing the frame spacing, making for a more flexible structure and reducing localized stresses. Welding is a very specialized skill and welding of ships and submarines particularly in need of skilled tradesman and excellent QC. Additionally thins was a fairly new technology at the time, still maturing, and with the rush of a "War ON" it's amazing that it worked as well as it did!

Back to the original topic? Maybe the F6F Hellcat, tough, reliable, versatile and good enough at what it was called upon to do. A little hard to bifurcate the theaters, but unless we had been able to achieve air superiority in the Pacific, it would have affected the contributions to the "Euro" theater. Had the Japanese not felt the pressure, they might have give the USSR a two front war.
 
In Europe, I think one can argue for the P-51, not just because it was a world-beater (it was very good, but not that good), but because the Luftwaffe knew that a dangerous, high-performance fighter, as good as anything they had with pistons, would be guarding insane numbers of bombers on every raid into Germany. Handwriting, meet wall.
 

Defeat for the Germans was essentially inevitable by the time the P-51 was introduced.

I generally speaking think that whatever the answer to the thread title is, the plane (at least in Europe) had to have been fighting and making a big impact by 1943 at the latest. If it was introduced in 1944 then it should be eliminated from the discussion straight away.
 
Last edited:

The Lancaster had become Bomber Commands most numerous bomber by the beginning of 1943. On Jan 16/17 190 of them went to Berlin, on the following night 170 went there. It was certainly out numbering the Wellington by the beginning of the Battle of the Ruhr. On March 11/12 314 of them went to Stuttgart. The B-17 didn't exceed 300 until the beginning of Blitz week when 309 bombed Norway, a pace they were unable to maintain. At the same time as Blitz Week the RAF was destroying a large part of Hamburg sending about 350 Lancasters on each of the 4 raids.
There is a misconception that the 8th Air Force was conducting a significant bombing campaign against Germany in 1943. They weren't. In 1943 the 8th AF dropped 27,598 tons of bombs on Germany in 1944 they dropped 296,839 tons, an order of magnitude greater.
Furthermore the Americans were only nibbling at the edges. The number of deep penetrations into German airspace before Big Week can almost be counted on the fingers of one hand. The attached graph from "A History of the VIII USAAF Fighter Command" illustrates this. I have taken the liberty of annotating the raids on Germany and France in different colors as well as adding the start dates for the P-38 and P-51.. It can be clearly seen that the USAAF did not start a serious bombing campaign against Germany until February 1944.
 

Attachments

  • Hist VIII AF Aces -Mileage to Target 02-18-19.pdf
    1.1 MB · Views: 59

RP,

Do you have the equivalent Bomber Command chart for a comparison?

Cheers,
Biff
 
On Jan 16/17 190 of them went to Berlin, on the following night 170 went there. It was certainly out numbering the Wellington by the beginning of the Battle of the Ruhr

From Wiki so take it for what you think it is worth.

12/13 March...................Essen......................... Raid by 457 aircraft - 158 Wellingtons, 156 Lancasters, 91 Halifaxes, 42 Stirlings, 10 Mosquitos on Krupp factory in Essen. 23 aircraft were lost.


granted this is just one raid and granted the Lancaster carried more bombs on average than even the Halifax and Stirling let alone the Wellington.

It took a while for the Lancaster to become the majority of bombers in bomber command. Due to it's range and payload it was doing more than the others on a per plane basis but that is not what we are talking about.

What I was trying to clarify was "massive bombing campaigns using Lancasters before the USAF turned up in force with the B-17's"

Now the words "massive bombing campaigns" and " USAF turned up in force" are certainly subject to interpretation as neither phrase has any numbers.

The British were certainly conducting massive raids (1000 bomber) as parts of a massive campaign well before the US showed up at all. And while they were feeding Lancasters into the MIX as fast as they could these massive campaigns were not using Lancasters in the numbers suggested by the words "massive bombing campaigns using Lancasters" even if those words are technically correct.
17 squadrons had received Lancasters by the end of 1942 and I am not sure if all of those had been declared operational at that time. This is certainly a commendable achievement given that the first operational use of the Lancaster was just over 9 months before. and 7 squadrons had been equipped by some point in June of 1942.

I am not trying to deny the British were first, or were not conducting massive raids (and suffering high casualties from all commonwealth nations) before the US showed up.

The British also showed a large increase in bombs dropped over the years



The RAF certainly did drop more bombs the the USAAF, but giving the bulk of the credit to the Lancaster in 1942/43 rather ignores the Wellington, Halifax and Stirling.
 
Judging by tons of bombs sprinkled somewhat at random across the darkened German countryside may not be a profitable use of statistics. The evaluation of true contribution towards ending the war (Allied Victory) is quite complex and perhaps not completely possible with many intangibles.
 
Does available mean flying? I hope they weren't flying missions with Blenheims, Hampdens and Stirlings in mid 1942

There seem to have been a fair number of Fortresses and Liberators operating in The Med in most of 1943 though I'm not sure the precise numbers, I can check after work.
 
Yes, they were operational, with the Blenheim by then mainly on maritime duties, and the Hampden mine laying. The Stirling continued with main force until late 1943, and then on glider towing, para dropping and special duties until war's end.
 
I see so a chunk of these 670 bombers weren't really being used as such by then, or at least not on raids into Germany
 
There were design issues but massive metallurgy issues too. The quality of steels as regards crack propagation, ductile brittle fracture, heat affected zone cracking, through thickness tensile values, temperature transition curves and a huge leap in testing, the Charpy test went from being a little known university research tool to a routine means or testing of welds and parent material while the "Battelle" DWTT test for steel was developed in USA for steel plate. It would be churlish to suggest that the advances in metallurgy were on par with those in jet engines, but they involve the production of hundreds of thousands of tons of steel.
 
Resp:
Galland told Goering he would take "a squadron of Spitfires" in response to Goering's question, "what do you need to accomplish your mission." So from one German who was there point of view, he named the aircraft that he thought most significant.
 

Users who are viewing this thread