Deleted member 68059
Staff Sergeant
- 1,058
- Dec 28, 2015
I do not believe it is possible to make any serious comparison with Russian engine lifespan and others, the conditions there were totally different - in both terms of the mechanics, their facilities and the general conditions (usually a sandy dusty airfield with almost no proper tools).
A good example of this is Rolls-Royce internal reports on the use of Merlin engines sent over to repair "russian" Hurricanes. A Merlin which had passed type test in England, would be finished in 40hours in Russia, the collossal amounts of fine grit/sand in the airfields there was the main factor discussed in the reports at the time, second was the somewhat basic methods the Russian mechanics had to use, which was not due to stupidity, just total lack of tools, facilities, proper spare parts and training.
Anything being run in Russia in WW2 can perhaps - be best compared to how our engines ended up in Africa service.
A good example of this is Rolls-Royce internal reports on the use of Merlin engines sent over to repair "russian" Hurricanes. A Merlin which had passed type test in England, would be finished in 40hours in Russia, the collossal amounts of fine grit/sand in the airfields there was the main factor discussed in the reports at the time, second was the somewhat basic methods the Russian mechanics had to use, which was not due to stupidity, just total lack of tools, facilities, proper spare parts and training.
Anything being run in Russia in WW2 can perhaps - be best compared to how our engines ended up in Africa service.