Lucky13
Forum Mascot
Cool pic mate, thanks for sharing!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
My father in law ran the last operational F-106 squadron in the USAF. These were the chase planes used on the B-1B program. He said he also had a chance to fly dissimilar air combat simulations against F-15s, and depending on the pilot and scenario, sometimes the -106 would come out on top.
He said it lost a lot of energy in turns and didn't accelerate fast, but would continue to accelerate to the point where it would self destruct, one of the fastest aircraft he flew.
This is him in his aircraft
I have to ask though.... Wasn't it bl**dy annoying to have that frame right infront of you, like the early P-47's?
The lucky s-o-b.....whoops...sorry!
So what about a comparison between the Lightning and the F-106. Who's got the edge in your opinion ?
It was one helluva ship when all the bugs were ironed out of the fire control systems.
At the same load (4038 lbs) as what generated the 1.02 T/W of the lightning, I get .86 of for the F-106 (loaded weight of 28458 lbs).
If you look at the mission - namely bomber killing interceptor - and maybe take on some unlikely escort with those bombers - I would go F-106 all day long. Far greater range for 106 vs Lightning and near equivalency against each other but superior to the 'other guy'
The intangible is that the 106 also had the lowest accident rate of any of the Century fighters for USAF. It was one helluva ship when all the bugs were ironed out of the fire control systems.
I'd choose the Lightning I must admit. The reason being that the Lightning turns climbs much better than the F-106, plus it's got a higher ceiling as-well.
The only two things the F-106 seems to have going for it is its' speed range.
So apart from the fact that the F-106 has over double the range, I can't really see why you'd choose it over the Lightning ? Atleast not for defense. For escort, yes, then I can see why and I'd agree.
The fact the 106 manuevered extremely well against the F-15 is a very high testimonial on it's manueverability with a fighter 20 years younger.
It would be nice if we had access to a Red Flag type exercise between the 106 and Lightning but I haven't found anything of that nature.