The Group Build Participants Icon Thread....

• May 17, 2009

• #241

Wurger

Siggy Master

Staff

Admin

Mod

112,161

30,242

Jun 19, 2005

Poland

Well....I'll wait for a few other opinions but if nobody wants to post them I'll follow the B-17.

 

• May 17, 2009

• #242

109ROAMING

2nd Lieutenant

5,971

5

May 25, 2008

New Zealand

Very nice work Wojtek!

 

• May 18, 2009

• #243

Catch22

Major

9,551

82

Jun 13, 2007

Edmonton, Alberta

www.coryulmer.com

Hmm, I think we should do something other than the B-17, maybe the IL-4 as we've already done a British and American plane.

 

• May 18, 2009

• #244

Airframes

Benevolens Magister

63,030

12,579

Aug 24, 2008

Cheshire, UK

I like them all Wojtek. However, to cater for 'worldwide appeal', I think either the Lanc or the B17 would be more immediately recognizable. As Dan pointed out, there's already a British type in the MTO build, so probably the B17 would be the best to symbolise the theme of the build.

 

• May 18, 2009

• Thread starter
• #245

lesofprimus

Brigadier General

18,831

47

Jul 27, 2004

Long Island Native in Mississippi

ihatemeatballs.com

Hey Wojtek, any way u can add the banner to the top of the 190 like u did with the Corsair????

 

• May 19, 2009

• #246

Wurger

Siggy Master

Staff

Admin

Mod

112,161

30,242

Jun 19, 2005

Poland

Of course I can...Here you are,

 

Attachments

• GB1choice2a.gif

  3.5 KB · Views: 83
• GB1choice2.gif

  3.6 KB · Views: 138

Last edited: May 19, 2009

• May 19, 2009

• Thread starter
• #247

lesofprimus

Brigadier General

18,831

47

Jul 27, 2004

Long Island Native in Mississippi

ihatemeatballs.com

Thank u very much Wojtek.....

 

• May 19, 2009

• #248

Wurger

Siggy Master

Staff

Admin

Mod

112,161

30,242

Jun 19, 2005

Poland

No problem Buddy. I guess the rest of projects for GB has to be of the same layout right?

 

• May 19, 2009

• Thread starter
• #249

lesofprimus

Brigadier General

18,831

47

Jul 27, 2004

Long Island Native in Mississippi

ihatemeatballs.com

Yea, but the N. Africa one is good to go cause u used a different banner, and the PTO is right on track....

 

• May 19, 2009

• #250

Wurger

Siggy Master

Staff

Admin

Mod

112,161

30,242

Jun 19, 2005

Poland

These banners for both PTO,Defence of the Reich and N.Africa Memeber's Choice are the same in a shape.But The Corsair was a little bit too big So I decided to put the banner inverted in order to let the aircraft be seen better.That's way I put it there in that way.

 

• May 19, 2009

• #251

Wayne Little

Moderator

Staff

Mod

64,421

6,741

Oct 7, 2006

Adelaide Sth. Aust.

Like the B-17 the best....

 

• May 19, 2009

• #252

Wurger

Siggy Master

Staff

Admin

Mod

112,161

30,242

Jun 19, 2005

Poland

OK. with B-17

 

Attachments

• Heavy-Hitters-5-place3.gif

  4.9 KB · Views: 77
• Heavy-Hitters-5-place2.gif

  4.9 KB · Views: 51,305
• Heavy-Hitters-5-place1.gif

  5 KB · Views: 126,750
• Heavy-Hitters-5.gif

  4.8 KB · Views: 84
• Heavy-Hitters-5-place3a.gif

  4.9 KB · Views: 84,917
• Heavy-Hitters-5a-mc.gif

  4.7 KB · Views: 83,918

Last edited: Mar 16, 2010

• May 19, 2009

• Thread starter
• #253

lesofprimus

Brigadier General

18,831

47

Jul 27, 2004

Long Island Native in Mississippi

ihatemeatballs.com

Awesome work Wojtek, thanks for all the work....

 

• May 19, 2009

• #254

Wurger

Siggy Master

Staff

Admin

Mod

112,161

30,242

Jun 19, 2005

Poland

THX Dan.. What next?

 

• May 19, 2009

• #255

Maglar

Tech Sergeant

1,570

8

Jan 29, 2009

Florida

Nice Woj, I Love the B17!

Not to throwdown the set up, but I think it would be cool to have different planes for the different "place" rankings for each GB. Say a Corsair for participants, then 1st is like an avenger, 2nd Catalina, 3rd " ". Just an idea, public opinion may not like it, which im fine with..

 

• May 19, 2009

• #256

Wurger

Siggy Master

Staff

Admin

Mod

112,161

30,242

Jun 19, 2005

Poland

The idea sounds good but I'm not sure if we need a such number of these icon.But maybe...

Here the next set . This time it's for Eastern Front.

 

Attachments

• EF-place3.gif

  3.9 KB · Views: 89
• EF-place2.gif

  3.9 KB · Views: 96
• EF-place1.gif

  3.9 KB · Views: 97
• EF-choice.gif

  3.6 KB · Views: 107
• EF-general.gif

  3.7 KB · Views: 93
• EF-place3a.gif

  3.8 KB · Views: 97

Last edited: May 19, 2009

• May 19, 2009

• #257

Catch22

Major

9,551

82

Jun 13, 2007

Edmonton, Alberta

www.coryulmer.com

Nice!

 

• May 19, 2009

• #258

Maglar

Tech Sergeant

1,570

8

Jan 29, 2009

Florida

True true Wurger, it probably cuts more work out for you.. no one wants that! Even though it would only be 4 different planes that served in the campaign. Plenty of times for ideas and innovation, great looking east front planes!

 

• May 19, 2009

• #259

Wurger

Siggy Master

Staff

Admin

Mod

112,161

30,242

Jun 19, 2005

Poland

We will see.More opinion is needed.

In meantime there is a slightly corrected set for Defence of the Reich.

 

Attachments

• DR-place3.gif

  4 KB · Views: 92
• DR-general.gif

  3.9 KB · Views: 376,268
• DR-place2.gif

  4.1 KB · Views: 92
• DR-place1.gif

  3.9 KB · Views: 88
• DR-choice.gif

  3.7 KB · Views: 1,544
• DR-place3a.gif

  3.9 KB · Views: 84

Last edited: May 19, 2009

• May 19, 2009

• #260

Catch22

Major

9,551

82

Jun 13, 2007

Edmonton, Alberta

www.coryulmer.com

Maglar said:

True true Wurger, it probably cuts more work out for you.. no one wants that! Even though it would only be 4 different planes that served in the campaign. Plenty of times for ideas and innovation, great looking east front planes!

Click to expand...

I don't think it will work as all it does is:

1. Make more work

2. Make it more confusing

Plus, we'd have to go through which plane should be what etc, etc.