The early production KI-43s had this issue, but was quickly resolved.
As I understand it, this issue wasn't really resolved until the -II series came out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
The early production KI-43s had this issue, but was quickly resolved.
The issues with the KI-43-I were addessed at field depots with repairs and reinforcement of the wing structures and wrinkled wing surfaces.As I understand it, this issue wasn't really resolved until the -II series came out.
Yes. The Sakae was about 1,100 hp and the Kaseo was 1,500 to 1,800 hp. The nrest of the reliable radials were lower power.
Almost all of the engines that made more power had longevity or quality issues. And they never DID figure out how to make a good inline, liquid-cooled aero engine during the war.
Very Japanese.According to one source in the 70's, a book by a lawyer who was involved with the Japanese war crimes trials, the quality issue came from the Japanese taking all males out of school when they reached a certain age and then stuck them in war production factories. At their next birthday they were conscripted into one of the military services. This meant that they spent a relatively large percentage of their manufacturing time in training and became cannon fodder soon after becoming competent at their jobs. Other countries used women workers and/or classified the male workers as essential and blocked them from being conscripted.
Was the core issue here that Japan lacked sufficiently powerful engines to carry the extra weight of protection?
Very Japanese.
Typical of the disdain for manpower shown at all levels of Japanese society.
Nah, don't buy that. When you are short of resources it does not automatically follow that you waste those resources you do have.I believe this is a consequence of getting into a war that they did not have the resources to actually fight.
Sometimes you have to "Rob Peter to pay Paul as they say." Or sort of like deficit spending. Eventually it all comes tumbling down.
It is just a matter when and how.
Nah, don't buy that. When you are short of resources it does not automatically follow that you waste those resources you do have.
This attitude, that manpower and by extension experience and training are wholly disposable assets, is reflected in the rampant abuse in the ranks, failure to rotate personnel, failure to preserve pilots of high experience etc etc. It's even explicit in the oft repeated mantra: A soldier's life is light as a feather, duty is heavy as a mountain. It's dehumanization which comes back to bite it's own ass in a mechanized war.
I would change this to "They were hoping for something small and quick and choreographed."They were expecting something small and quick and choreographed.
They didn't exactly "get into a war."I believe this is a consequence of getting into a war that they did not have the resources to actually fight.
Sometimes you have to "Rob Peter to pay Paul as they say." Or sort of like deficit spending. Eventually it all comes tumbling down.
It is just a matter when and how.
Yes, these black-ish things Japanese military were throwing around in the late 1941 and before were actually the black chrysanthemums, but the West declared than as bombs and torpedoes.They didn't exactly "get into a war."
USA blockaded raw materials intended for Japan, not coming from Japan.The USA blockaded raw materials from Japane and they were forced to either fight or surrender as a
IJ could have ceased their offensive operations in FIC and China, which is hardly surrender. As for 'fighting a war they didn't seek', they certainly seemed to have planned it out to the last detail.They didn't exactly "get into a war."
Before World War II, the US imposed a series of economic sanctions and a de facto blockade on Japan, culminating in a full oil embargo in 1941, after Japan's expansion into French Indochina and other aggressive actions in Asia. So, they were hurting for raw material and there was no real way to end the blockade whort of a military action. They were forced to either fight a war they didn't really seek or want, or surrender as a country. Japanese millitary leaders were basically forced into being pro-war by the situation.
It's not a pretty picture, but it happened.
The occupation of French Indochina was in furtherance of their war with China. It closed Haiphong as a port for Chinese supplies and opened another front for offensive action.IJ could have ceased their offensive operations in FIC and China, which is hardly surrender. As for 'fighting a war they didn't seek', they certainly seemed to have planned it out to the last detail.
Correct, things goling to Japan.Yes, these black-ish things Japanese military were throwing around in the late 1941 and before were actually the black chrysanthemums, but the West declared than as bombs and torpedoes.
Probably the greatest misunderstanding of all the times.
USA blockaded raw materials intended for Japan, not coming from Japan.