- Thread starter
-
- #741
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
.Sharp attacks by the Labor Party and whole of the British press on the Government regarding its handling of the Norwegian campaign. Demand for an exhaustive inquiry into the reasons for defeat. Criticism is directed particularly against the inadequate equipment of the Expeditionary Force, the inactivity of the British Fleet, which operated only off Narvik, i.e, in a safe area (fear of risks), the inferiority of the R.A.F. and the reluctance of the British leaders to make decisions, The perfect cooperation between the German Army and Air Force is specially emphasized. The general effect of the defeat in Norway has very much shaken Chamberlain's position. Demands are being made for the creation of a War Cabinet and the formation of a new National Government to include the Labor and Liberal parties and In the circumstances this can be expected to materialize.
In a speech in Charleroi, President Pierlot again declared Belgium's firm resolve to prevent any passage of troops through her territory, Belgium was- no longer a battlefield where other nations could fight out their disputes. In Belgium' only a static war would be possible, which gives no hope of a quick decision. An attack or a comparable act incompatible with Belgian security or prestige would fore 3 her to fight to the last man.
On passage to the Baltic the GNEISENAU, escorted by MSW M "98" and. the MSW Flot 12, struck a mine NW of Westertill, Compartment V, on the port side. British ground-mine. The ship continued her passage at 18 knots. According to later information damage is only slight. Mine defense apparently took second place when putting out into the open sea. Realizing that the danger from mines existed mainly in the river estuarie s, while there was danger from submarines further out, the Fleet had provided mine defense in the Jade and Elbe, but during the passage at high speed in the open sea gave priority to ASW measures. Since the enemy has dropped aerial mines between the Jade and Elbe, he cannot intend also to use submarines in these waters.
The Elbe is temporarily closed on account of the doubtful mine situation e The Weser and the Ems must also be closed to vessels with cargoes of ore until a check sweep has been carried out. Minelaying by enemy planes is beginning to make itself unpleasantly felt and causing serious interruptions on the traffic routes which are important to German war economy.
Numerous reports of submarine-chase in the Heligoland Bight have led Group Wast to make an urgent requiest for thy return
of the 12th Submarine-Chaser Flotilla. Bearing in mind that the GNEISENAU has struck a mine, the Group also requests the
return of the 2nd Minesweeper Flotilla, as it has not enough vessels to keep the main channels clear.
Once the transport of the 2nd Gebirgsjager XX to Norway is completed in a few days' time, it will be possible to return the escort units urgently required for protecting transports in the Skagerrak/Kattegat area.
ArrivalsU 25 and U 65, the only boats west of the Shetlands, have been given freedom of action in the whole area. U 32 entered Trondheim, U 14 Kiel. Her experience off Bergen and NW of the Shetlands do not differ from those of other boats. UA and U 101 have been ordered to return direct from Trondheim. Now that the English have retreated from the whole of southern Norway, an operation against the supply routes to Narvik doesn't promise success. According to radio intelligence reports, 2 steamers, one a 6,000 tonner, have run into the minefield laid by U 9 in the Firth of Moray. This is further proof of the fact that such minefields, laid with the mines far apart, are successful in the long run. "Gneisenau" struck an a/c mine between the Elbe and the Jade. It is thus necessary for boats to proceed only with mine escort until they reach the 25 meter line. This will mean delays, with the few forces we have at present which are suitable as escort only against contact mines. U 24, 57, 59, 61 were first ordered to Wilhelmshaven instead of to the Elbe, as it was thought that the mine hit had occurred in the Elbe, Gneisenau having given a wrong position.
Koht spoke to the Norwegian nation from the B.B.C., London. He declared that he had gone to London and Paris to carry out
negotiations on behalf of the Norwegian Government. He spoke with great hatred about the German campaign in Norway. The
German attack on Norway had been planned a long time in advance. Now hypocritical speeches were being made in the attempt to cover up this fact. "Great Britain and France will help us in our struggle and the Polish Government is sending 10,000 men. Naturally it must be some time before this aid can take effect. The Western Powers have solemnly pledged themselves to help us."
Great Britain :
The press is discussing the possibility that a Government crisis could be avoided at present by granting fuller powers to Churchill (Ministry coordinating the three Services). Severe criticism of the Norwegian campaign by Lloyd George.
Vatican
The Belgian Ambassador to the Vatican has reported to his Government; "The attack on Belgium and Holland is said to be scheduled for the coming week (the telegram is dated 2 May). It is probable that Italy will soon enter the' war also."
Conference on the Situation with Chief, Naval Staff
1. Order for Operation "Gelb" will be given very soon. The Fuehrer f.s decision depends merely on the. weather situation.
2. Discussion on the "Anti-mine Organization". Chief, Naval Staff wishes to build up the organization as soon as possible in order to solve the problem .of. defense against mines, since otherwise there is a real, danger that our whole shipping will be crippled.
he British Admiralty announces the sinking of the DD AFRIDI off Namsos (hit by a bomb . and the loss of the British destroyer THUNDERBOLT (1,975 tons, formerly the Polish DD GROMK; The French Naval Staff reports the loss of the large DD BISON (2,136 tons) on 3 May. She was bombed while proceeding in an Allied troop, convoy.
Naval Staff thinks it possible that the AFRIDI was the "cruiser of the YORK class" which the LW reported to have destroyed on 3 May.
Northern Norway;
In addition to the naval forces recently reported in the Harstad- Narvik area, air reconnaissance has detected another BB in the Tjelsund. Several steamers were unloading in Harstad. The CV reported in the Narvik area is probably the ARK ROYaL. Several transports have been observed in Tromsoe.
43 of the survivors of the HUNTER are said to have arrived in Northern Sweden where they have been interned. According to a B.B.C. report they are shortly to be released from internment (as survivors from shipwreck) and returned to Britain. This report has still to be confirmed. By releasing these internees, Sweden would create a very significant and desirable precedent for the treatment of our own DD crews in the event of their withdrawal to Sweden.
U 9 sailed for case "GELB", UA and U 101 for Trondheim. U 25, 24, 57, 59, 61 entered Wilhelmshaven, U 25 unexpectedly. She had trouble with her transmitter during the last few days and could not report. She made the same observations as the other boats in the Westfjord, but the Commanding Officer knew how to make clever use of the positive aspects of disposition in the fjords. He is probably responsible for the sinking of a destroyer off Narvik. U 24 had no opportunities to attack off Bergen and NE of the Shetlands. U 61 was operating first off Trondheim (Gripshoelm) and then off the Minch. Her experiences agree with those of U 13 (see 2.5). Off the Minch she sighted the "Warspite" at 12,000 meters and later had to start on her return passage as one diesel was out of action. U 57 and U 59 confirm the impression that it is now hardly possible to operate east of the Orkneys and Shetlands. U 57 was heavily depth-charged. She had 2 unmistakable gyro failures and so lost her chances of success. Since 16.1 U 57 has been at sea for 82 days out of 111 (-74%). With this, the limits of the possible have been reached. there are similar cases with other boats. Many boats will require a long period of rest after these weeks of utmost strain.
Today saw the beginning of the Commons debate on the Norwegian campaign. The main objections of public opinion to the
Government's handling of affairs are particularly as follows:
1. The employment of obsolete methods. The war of 19 40 was conducted exactly like that of 1914, without any regard
for new military weapons,
2. Preparations for the Norwegian campaign were inadequate and the planning was far too cursory.
3. The Allies were slow and hesitating in their political and military decisions, while the Germans acted quickly.
4. The reports given to the public were misleading and full of misinformation. At first complete success was reported and this made the ensuing disappointment all the more sharply felt. The French press also emphasizes this objection particularly.
5. The events in Norway have made a very unfavorable impression on the neutrals.
Embassy reports from Stockholm, Helsinki and Belgrade emphasize that the Allied evacuation of Namsos without notification to
the Norwegians has made a deep impression in Sweden, Finland and Yugoslavia. The British attitude is regarded as absolute
treachery and means a heavy blow to British prestige. The Swedish attitude towards Germany has greatly improved,
Superior enemy forces supported by artillery are pressing back our troops belonging to Group "Windisch" , Group Narvik
has made an urgent request for air. support and submarine operations against the namerous enemy forces. In reply to
an inquiry from Commanding Admiral, Norway he was informed that experiences and losses to date have shown that submarine
operations are not possible inthe Narvik area. Reasons s
a) Insufficient darkness for submarines to surf act to recharge batteries «
b) Best conditions for pursuit using hydrophone and location gear and for air partrol
c) No possibility of immediate withdrawal from the narrow fjords in the event of strong anti-submarine measures.
Hence further submarine operations are impossible.
Narvik requested U-boats as defense against enemy landings. Naval War Staff refused. A request from Sea Defense Commandant Trondheim to use U 32 as wing protection for Army troops proceeding north also had to be refused.With the few U-boats available, it is already difficult to do without the transport boats. It is essential to avoid wasting boats for other subsidiary tasks, especially if these do not promise any success.
Debate on Norway iir the House of Lor^s. Continuation of the Commons debate. Chamberlain openly admitted the failure of the Norwegian campaign. The main thing now was to avoid splitting up British forces, i.e. to use them where vital interests had
to be protected in view of German aggression.
The Norwegian Commander in Chief had repeatedly made urgent requests for an attack on Trondheim at all costs, as this town was important not only as a port but also as the seat of the Royal Government. It was said that the Norwegians would no longer dare to continue their resistance if there were no serious attempt to attack Trondheim. Under these circumstances Great Britain had taken the risk. The number of troops sent to Trondheim did not depend on the number of men available, but on the speed of finding suitable ports, which were still ...open to British forces. The British plan to capture Trondheim failed for two reasons:
1) The impossibility of taking air bases.
2) The unexpected rapidity with which German reinforcements
.. were brought up.
Chamberlain closed his speech with an appeal to Parliament to stand together at this critical time. In the course of the Commons debate, the Government came under sharp attack and the hesitant and indecisive attitude of the leaders and the lack of enthusiasm of the Fleet and the R.A.F. were subjected to criticism. The Labor Party called for resignation of the Government and the Conservatives for the formation of a War Cabinet. A statement made by Member of Parliament Wedgewood is worth
noting. He said that in future. Great Britain must be prepared even to take illegal and unexpected action, as Hitler had done
to date* Britain's Fleet was in a position to save Britain from starvation, but not from invasion. Since the Fleet had
not prevented the. German landing in Norway, it was quite conceivable that it would also not be able to prevent a landing
in Lincolnshire.
Adm Roger Keyes denied these statements,, He particularly regretted that Trondheim had not been taken by assault, and
action which in his opinion would have been quite possible and successful. At the opening of the Norwegian campaign he
had gone to the Admiralty to suggest an action based on his experiences at Gallipoli and on the Belgian coast during World
War I. His suggestion had been turned down. Ho was told that the Mediterranean situation made it undesirable to risk
ships in the Norway operation.
U 65 has been recalled. She is alone NW of the ORkneys and it is no longer possible for her to proceed to another more favorable operations area, as she has used up most of her supplies. It is therefore better not to keep this boat at sea any longer, but to make her ready at time for operation in the Atlantic, now that it is finally clear that operation west of the Orkneys is very difficult for large boats.
Former cabinet minister Leo Amery joined the debate, criticizing the entire British approach to the war. He demanded that a new coalition government be formed, with a smaller war cabinet similar to the leadership in WW1. Amery admitted that his criticism of the Prime Minister and members of his cabinet was awkward as he counted many of them as friends. Despite this, he said he felt it necessary to quote Oliver Cromwell when addressing the Prime Minister."It is not the fault of those for whom I speak that the enemy have been left in undisputable possession of vulnerable ports and aerodromes for nearly a month, have been given time to pour in reinforcements by sea and air, to land tanks, heavy artillery and mechanized transport, and have been given time to develop the air offensive which has had such a devastating effect on the morale of Whitehall. If they had been more courageously and offensively employed they might have done much to prevent these unhappy happenings and much to influence unfriendly neutrals."
Other MPs continued the criticism, with one, Arthur Greenwood, asking if there were any MPs left who were not aware of the dissatisfaction with the British efforts so far in the war. He also compared the muted, false cheers for the Prime Minister when he first stood to speak with the much more enthusiastic cheers for Sir Roger Keyes when he explained the inept leadership. The debate continues tomorrow."You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go."
,In view of the situation in Northern Norway, conversations have taken place in Stockholm between the Swedish Government and
German representatives to see whether, if necessary, supplies for Narvik can be effected extensively from Sweden, While there are possibilities of transit for food and medical supplies, strict neutrality has made the Swedish Government refuse permission for armaments to pass through,
Great Britain :
Noteworthy is a statatement by Churchill that In order to. increase the effectiveness of the blockade Btitish submarines have orders to sink all German ships without warning by day or at night. (Order came into force on 3 April.) Churchill emphasized the
alleged heavy German losses and, like. Chamberlain, vigorously denied the loss of large British ships. At the division there were 281 votes for the Government and 200 against . Havas reports that the British Government has taken special measures to prevent any invasion from land, sea or air. Increased defense of all British airfields against surprise landings by German troop-. transport planes. Plans drawn up to guard all strategically important points on main roads. Obstacles prepared to hinder the advance of invasion troops.
U 101 and UA entered Heligoland and in the afternoon both proceeded up the Elbe to Kiel, attached to an escort unit. These boats have carried supplies to Trondheim. The transport of petrol was unpleasant, but presented no major difficulties. No attacks were made.
and RNZN CL LEANDER.
Chris, don't know where you got that last 'fact', but sound to me like a lot of humbug. Never heard of bridges being held before the invasion. Don't think it ever happened, although there were a lot of rumours about fifth collumnists, back in the day.WESTERN FRONT: German commandos in Dutch uniforms crossed the Dutch border to hold bridges for the advancing German army.
Ah, that was a rumour back then, but I think there is a mistake in that. German soldiers dressed as Dutch have indeed tried to capture some bridges, but they entered the country during the night of 9-10 May 1940.Marcel, that was sort of poor sentence writing. They had soldiers acting like Dutchmen until the invasion and then they went for the bridges. Nothing before. Again poor sentence structure.
Our troops marched in for the decisive battle against the Western Powers in Holland, Belgium and Luxemburg Holland and Belgium are offering resistance and appealing to Great Britain and France for help " The Dutch Government "has announced that
a state of war exists between Germany and Holland as from 0855
The German Foreign Minister declared that the German measures were necessary in order to defeat the plan of the Western Powers to attack the Ruhr area via Holland and Belgium, The Western Powers announce that they are determined to give effective help to Holland and Belgium immediately and with all the means in their power.
Chamberlain resigned at the critical hour since the. Labor Party refused to serve in him Government. Winston Churchill" Is '"'taking'
over the post of PM and re-forming the Government. Iceland has been occupied by British troops. A guarantee was given to the Icelandic Government that the purpose of the occupation was to safeguard the island against German invasion. At the close, of hostilities troops would be withdrawn
USA
Attitude not clear, but apparently for the present determined to maintain neutrality whilst giving extensive indirect support to the Western Powers.
Norway
King Haakon is apparently very ill in Tromsoe. It is reported that members of the Norwegian Parliament intend to go to Tromso to urge the King to open peace negotiations with Germany.
Operations comments
Army operations in Holland, Belgium and Luxemburg have gone according to plan and succeeded beyond our expectations.
In spite of their extensive defensive measures we have, everywhere caught the enemy by surprise. The general impression of Army and Air Force operations on the evening of 10 May is esceedingly favorable.
There is not a single mention of Fall Gelb in Donitz's war diary.C-in-C Navy in the plotting room, head of Operations Department reported to him. The transport boats are being redistributed: U 25, a boat which is not very suitable for use in the Atlantic, will be converted for transport. U 122 will make one transport trip and then be available for use in the Atlantic. UA, U 26 and U 123 will remain detached for transport, U 123 after she has commissioned. The smaller Type VII boats, which have only a small carrying capacity for a/c petrol, will thus be released from transport duties.