USA Lend-Lease f4U Corsair to Russia?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

There is always some misinformation about the exact idea of the Hyde Park Declaration. Who's giving whom defense articles and how is the "lend-lease" involved. To express it with less words I'll quote the original text:
"In so far as Canadian defense purchases in the United States consist of component parts to be used in equipment and munitions which Canada is producing for Great Britain, it was also agreed that Great Britain will obtain these parts under the lease-lend (sic!) act and forward them to Canada for inclusion in the finished articles."
Now this is completely different from your first information that Canada had a "similar smaller program under a different name", isn't it?
Cheers!
P.S. Of course the "eager beaver" was a joke but it got lost in translation...
 
Just too much time spent on reading the WarThunder and DeviantArt sites.
The modeler of the "Soviet Corsair" added the following note to his model: (check the full build here).
Nothing you see here is real, even though the conversion or the presented background story might be based upon historical facts. BEWARE!
I hope that's enough for Henry-63, n'est-ce pas?
Cheers!
 
Last edited:

Yep.. Unfortunately he seems to be well known at the What-if world ... that creates the false image of the History and reality.

 

It would probably surprise you that a lot of us know quite a bit about the Lend-Lease program and what was shipped to whom and when. After all. it has all been spelled out on the web for years for those those who can stir their bones in an effort to find out the real scoop rather that repeat the trash from some artist's web site or "what if" modelers.
 
From what I understand there was a lot of reverse lend lease as well. I heard the Soviet Union supplied the US about 40 LaGG-3s for the defense of the Panama Canal. Although the shipment was made about the time the war ended, the Soviets didn't want the disassembled airframes returned and they sat at a pier in Miami for months. Eventually they were declared surplus and sold to the civilian market. Since all the manuals were in Russian, every airframe was parted out, engines found their way on swamp boats and the wooden fuselages were bought up by farmers who cut the wood fuselages in half and used them for midget orange tree planters. The wings were made into swamp boats and Manatee mating
platforms.

 
55 kills is a lot for the Soviet Union. The top USSR aces seem to have flown La-5s and Bell P-39s.

I searched Google for Soviet air aces.

I understand the Soviets received at least one P-47, but this aircraft methodically violated every single rule of Soviet air tactics and strategy.
 
55 kill Soviet flying an F4U? Total BS - now my last 2 posts, take them to the bank!

Now seriously, Soviet P-47s? They received about 200 of them.




 
Ivan Kozhedub - 64
Grigory Rechkalov - 61
Nicholai Gulaev - 55
Kirill Yevstigneev - 53
Dmitri Glinka - 50
Alexander Pokyrishkin - 45

These are the top Soviet aces out of 131 who score more than 10 kills.

So about that bit of "55 kills is a lot"...
I said that 55 kills was a lot for the Soviet Union. I am not saying it did not happen.

For the record...
Ivan Kozhedub -- 64 -- La-5 mostly
Grigory Rechkalov -- 61 -- Polikarpov I-153 (biplane), P-39
Nicholai Gulayev -- 55 -- MiG-3, Yak-1, P-39
Kirill Yevstigneyev -- 53 -- La-5, La-7
Dmitri Glinka -- 50 -- Yak-1, P-40, P-39
Alexander Pokyrishkin -- 45 -- MiG-3, P-39

I am surprised here by the number of P-39s, and the lack of Yaks, particularly the Yak-3. No P-47s. No F4Us.
 

Users who are viewing this thread