wuzak
Captain
Thanks for your reply, Wuzak. I'm not so sure the no P-40 means no P-51, although if there is no V-1710 to power the airframe there might not be the transition to the Merlin. I've always thought the P-51 was designed in pretty much the perfect set of circumstances. It wasn't contracted by the USAAF and didn't have that oversight during initial design. The designer, Smued, had filed away a kind of outline of best ideas for a future fighter that he was able to draw upon and the lack of oversight let him put as many advances in the design as possible. Given the RAF's preference (tradition?) for inline power plants who's to say the Merlin wouldn't have been incorporated from the start. Just my thoughts.
Schmued may have had the origins of the fighter design which enabled him to quickly design the NA-73X, but was there an engine, other than the V-1710, to power it? And no, a Merlin was not the answer. All UK production was spoken for and US production would not produce significant quantities of engines for 2 years.
Without the British coming to NAA seeking a second supply of P-40s I'm not so sure that Schmued's fighter project would have been adequately funded.
Which means no Mustang/P-51.