Snautzer01
Honourably banned
- 42,971
- Mar 26, 2007
How about
I present my MesserStang
I present my MesserStang
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Is that true? The Germans were going to convert their 109 into a P-51 Mustang crossbreed?
No the Bf 109G-14 was the last varient of the G and it was a normal Bf 109. The varient also included the Bf 109G-14/AS. There were several thousand G-14s built.
His Messerstang is an artist rendering.
How about fitting a B-17 with jet engines?
Interesting none the less, but I still dont like it. To me it takes away from the menacing look of the Bf 109 that I like.
I would modify my country's I.A.R. 81 and replace the 7.92 mm FN machine guns with 13 mm MG 131 from the Bf109 and perhaps mount a 30 mm Mk108 cannon in the nose but for that probably would have to take out the 20 mm MG 151/20 from the wings...
Also, what would you introduce earlier? I would give the P40 Q a chance, (as is well known by most), give the Dautless a 2000 hp engine and two 20mm's in the wings along with normal armament. Hurricane could have used a bigger engine, and for the sake of being laughed at, a bubble canopy. Then the Miles M20 (21?), a good fighter that showed up early on with a bubble canopy, possibly 12.7mm guns in lieu of the 7.7mms, or a combination of 7.7mm and 20mm.
I would take a different slant on the 'What if" design or production considerations.
1. What if the F4U had also been purchased by the USAAF - the 8th AF would have had a longer range, more maneuverable escort fighter much earlier in the war.
I have wondered the same thing. But would the lack of a turbosupercharger (which the P-47 had) hinders its performance in the high altitude battles over Europe?
I would take a different slant on the 'What if" design or production considerations.
1. What if the F4U had also been purchased by the USAAF - the 8th AF would have had a longer range, more maneuverable escort fighter much earlier in the war.
I have wondered the same thing. But would the lack of a turbosupercharger (which the P-47 had) hinders its performance in the high altitude battles over Europe?
At 22-26,000 feet - not at all. It had a supercharger early and then water/meth injection in -4's.. The only real area that it was inferior to a P-47 was above 28-30K - in speed and maybe dive.
- yes at 35+