- Thread starter
- #101
FLYBOYJ
"THE GREAT GAZOO"
Especially since it couldn't shoot forward!
WHAT "DUD" WOULD YOU FLY?
- Thread starter FLYBOYJ
- Start date
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
the lancaster kicks ass
Major General
- 19,937
- Dec 20, 2003
actually she could, but not easily.........
- Thread starter
- #103
FLYBOYJ
"THE GREAT GAZOO"
the lancaster kicks ass said:
Now that's scary!
eddie_brunette
Senior Airman
P40 for me!!! It can and will held it own against most down low!! But is the P40 a dud though?
Glider
Captain
Fairy Battle. Slow, easy to fly so its not tiring, decent range so I can go in the other direction, easy to land in out of the way fields, space for the girlfriend and a picnic.
What else would you need?
What else would you need?
Soundbreaker Welch?
Tech Sergeant
The CW 21 looks cool.
drgondog
Major
We always talk about how good a fighter or bomber is, but what if you're stuck flying a "Dud?" For example, if I was a relatively new pilot I wouldn't be too happy flying the following in WW2....
P-40
P-39
Fairey Battle
Brewster Buffalo
Curtiss CW-21B
Douglas Devestator
Breda Ba.65
MiG-1
If you had to fly a "dud" which would you choose?
Joe - P-40 an easy choice for me in potential survivability with the P-39 next. The P-40 was inferior to contemporary Me 109 and Fw 190 (and Zero) but kinda held it's own as pilots got more combat experience
- Thread starter
- #109
FLYBOYJ
"THE GREAT GAZOO"
Oh agree 100% Bill - my point of the thread way back when was suppose it was late 1944 and you were a new fighter pilot ready to shoot down whatever in a new P-51 - then you find yourself flying P-40s for whatever reason. Or you're on your way to New Guinea and you're ready to get in a P-38 squadron and then suddenly you're flying P-39s....
Then again you could be a wanne-be Spitfire pilot and find yourself in a Battle or Defiant - Oh the disappointment!
ccheese
Member In Perpetuity
Think I'd go with the P-39..... altho some Russians did well with them.
Charles
Charles
One of the P39, the P40 or the Whirlwind.
The Basket
Senior Master Sergeant
- 3,712
- Jun 27, 2007
The Defiant was a fine flying aircraft but not when Bf 109s were about.
I would hate to call the P-40 a dud but I would go for that...They were still flying Hurricanes in 1944 so can I have one of them instead?
I would hate to call the P-40 a dud but I would go for that...They were still flying Hurricanes in 1944 so can I have one of them instead?
Wildcat
Major
I suppose alot of people class the Vengeance as a dud (not me!!) so I'll take one of those.
Freebird
Master Sergeant
We always talk about how good a fighter or bomber is, but what if you're stuck flying a "Dud?" For example, if I was a relatively new pilot I wouldn't be too happy flying the following in WW2....
P-40
P-39
Fairey Battle
Brewster Buffalo
Curtiss CW-21B
Douglas Devestator
Breda Ba.65
MiG-1
If you had to fly a "dud" which would you choose?
Are you sure the P-39 P-40 aren't too good to be on the "dud" list? Its hard to pick the best of a bad lot, because if its the best maybe its not a dud...
Perhaps this should be "what plane would you LEAST like to be in battle with?"
Speaking of Battle's I think it and the Devastator would be the worst. At least with the P-39 P-40 you had a chance to survive. And the Battle's flew the first "suicide missions" in the war.
Bf109_g
Senior Airman
I wouldn't mind having a go at a "suicide mission" in a Bristol Blenheim, so that
is my choice
is my choice
lastwarrior
Airman
I'll go for the P-40 but not Brewster Buffalo.
Fokker C.V. Slow, outdated, outnumbered but did the best it could given the situation.
Between P-39 and P-40, the P-39 had a much higher fatal accident rate in USAAF service. 47 per 100k flying hours v 17. See this page from USAAF stats digest, though you have to do a little arithmetic to get those numbers:
Army Air Forces in World War II
Otherwise, the armaments of the planes were different but basic performance was very similar for models with V-1710's, so the likes and dislikes (USAAF like the P-40 better, mainly for its successes in China, the Soviets liked the P-39 better) are probably mainly subjective.
On the list I also don't know why P-39 and P-40 are dud if Hurricane, MS406. Mc202 etc etc are not also duds. The Hurricane was an earlier plane, but a comparable or less capable plane ca. 1942 than either the P-40 or P-39, including side by side combat performance in places like early Pacific or Soviet northern theater. The P-39/40 were average fighters, not above average and not way below.
Joe
Army Air Forces in World War II
Otherwise, the armaments of the planes were different but basic performance was very similar for models with V-1710's, so the likes and dislikes (USAAF like the P-40 better, mainly for its successes in China, the Soviets liked the P-39 better) are probably mainly subjective.
On the list I also don't know why P-39 and P-40 are dud if Hurricane, MS406. Mc202 etc etc are not also duds. The Hurricane was an earlier plane, but a comparable or less capable plane ca. 1942 than either the P-40 or P-39, including side by side combat performance in places like early Pacific or Soviet northern theater. The P-39/40 were average fighters, not above average and not way below.
Joe
Desert Fox
Senior Airman
I personally would choose the Fairey Swordfish, 'Stringbag'. I would have loved to have flown on the Bismark mission!
