Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
so would've winning the war but there was no need to push allied jets when you own the airThe Jumo 004E would've solved the powerloss by altitude problem Pbfoot.
Is that at 6400 kg?
The extraordinary range of the P-51, giving the fighter the ability to take the fight to the enemy either alone or escorting bomber formations was the single greatest blow that any major Air Force was dealt in the war.
my opinion is that the zero had the greatest effect of any aircraft. This is a rather strange choice, I know, but consider this.
That someone could produce a fighter with performance greater than its land based opponents in 1941 was astounding. That it was an Asian nation that did this was earth shattering for many.
The Zero was the single weapon system that influenced the war in the Pacific in its early days more than any other single system. The successes of the Japanese in those early days inspired the development of post war independance movements across the asia pacific rim, and in a sense brought colonialism to an end.....and all of this can in part be traced back to the stunning successes enjoyed by the zero in its early days
They never could get the engines to work the way they wanted to in the ETO, the P-38 also was a VERY expensive and slow plane to mass-produce, they never had enough of them to really make that impact.The P38 gave the AAF its first long range fighter that had a chance to maintain air superiority