the lancaster kicks ass
Major General
- 19,937
- Dec 20, 2003
it's like a way of saying you we're inviting the comment, like it was the obvious thing to say........
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
my point of interest said:You all know Pierre Closterman for sure so I'm not going to write about him. Lets just say I read his book »The big show« and in it I found his testimony about the danger of crash-landing a Tempest V. The plane had a landing speed of 300km/h and cought fire very fast on crash landing, especially on bricked surfaces.
plan_D said:Here's a picture of a remarkable crash landing done in a Hurricane :
trackend said:This 109E (1190) was downed on 30th sept 1940 and the damage is original and not doctored
Image from my own personal collection and may be used in the public domain
FLYBOYJ said:It reminds me of that fat chick you would see wearing a tube top with all her fat hanging out!
Concorde247 said:FLYBOYJ said:It reminds me of that fat chick you would see wearing a tube top with all her fat hanging out!
do you mind - i think ive been out with her!!
DerAdlerIstGelandet said:I would not admit to that.
Concorde247 said:DerAdlerIstGelandet said:I would not admit to that.
Blame it on the beer!! - i did!!
DerAdlerIstGelandet said:In regards to the 109 even if you succesfully got the aircraft on the ground the landing gear would most likely collapse and then the aircraft would break apart on you and ultimatly killing you, and that is if the aircraft did not tip over on its nose and then you met the instrument panel. Either way I would bail out and not take any chances.
I agree!cheddar cheese said:Great pics Concorde! 8)