Which is the better fighter, P-40F or Typhoon?

P-40 or Typhoon

  • Total voters
    25

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Status
Not open for further replies.

From Warpaint Series No. 5 "Hawker Typhoon""...The three modified aircraft were shipped out to North Africa, erected at Casablanca, and flown to Egypt for trials with No. 451 Squadron RAAF at Idku. Although the trials established the feasibility of operating Typhoons in these climates, build up of the 2nd TAF mean that none could be spared for the Desert Air Force. One further Typhoon, MN290 was sent to the Middle East for trials, arriving in Alexandria in October 1944, but the trials at Khartoum were abandoned after two cooler failures."
 
Last edited:
The tropicalized version of the Bf 190F was slower than the standard Bf 190F by 6-7 km/h
 
Let see.
The first main use of the Typhoons was in intercepting the Fw190 on their tip and run raids. The P40F is about 60mph slower than the Typhoon at approx. 10,000ft so that will no doubt help the cause as the Fw190 seems to be about 30mph faster than the P40 at most altitudes.
Intercepting the V1 rockets again the slower speed on the P40 is no doubt an advantage.
GA missons again the much lower firepower would be of considerable assistance, plus of course the lower cruising speed will make it harder to intercept, its slower diving speed will ensure its survival when things get difficult and its much slower climb will help it make the most of any opportunities.
Finally the P40's lower protection will help it survive aa fire compared to the Typhoon and it less flexible GA weapons will add to the P40's effectiveness and in later years the reduced payload/range of the P40 would assist.
They used early P-40 / Tomahawks in an interdiction / recon mode for a little while from England,
Click to expand...
A very little while, in fact they were replaced just as quickly as they could. I admit to not understanding why this happened seen as (according to your previous postings) a Tomahawk was more than capable of taking on an Me109F. Have you any ideas why the RAF did such an illogical thing?

I admit the above is more than a little sarcastic but the performance differences are unarguable and the roles fulfilled by the Typhoon are again accurate. Put the two together and any thought that the P40 could do them nearly as well is simply foolish.
 
Not everything to do with shooting down a V1 was to do with speed, they were very small and very streamlined there were only a few things you could hit that would take it out, to hit them and take them down was difficult with MGs. Mosquitos at night got the second highest number of "kills" they certainly weren't the fastest in 1944 but they did have 4 fuselage mounted cannon.
 

As far as the British were concerned, home defence got priority pick - and they chose Spitfires and Typhoons.

Overseas commands got what could be spared - which was Hurricanes and P-40s, until enough Spitfires had been built that they could be sent O/S.

I don't think that there were ever enough Typhoons that they could afford too many O/S.
 
Schweik,

I'm not in agreement with your hypothesis, however you have opened a chapter in the P40 I didn't realize it had. For that I'm grateful as the P40 has long been a favorite and I was a 325th FW guy many years ago (and a 33rd FW - both previous Warhawk units).

Cheers,
Biff
 

There is nothing wrong with the P-40. It was an excellent aircraft, and it held its own even when it was surpassed by better aircraft. I don't think anyone will ever dispute it. It still should not be put on a pedestal too high though.
 
The P-40 is just too slow and too poor climbing to be competitive in 43 Northern Europe. The RAF never had any confidence in the P-40 in Europe, they used Hurricanes up until mid 42 when they were rapidly replaced by Typhoons or moved to other theaters. You could make the same arguments for the Hurricane being better than the Typhoon as have been presented here for the p-40 > Typhoon debate, but honestly if you had too lock horns with a FW-190, and if you value your life, you would pick the Typhoon.
 
Very good point that there are so many variables that come into play when compairing any two planes as to make it difficult to draw any conclusions from said comparison. It seems to me that there are two basic approaches to address this conundrum one being to include all the variables of circumstance and try to wieght them in some manner or more simply and in my view more practically draw the comparison from the most similar circumstances posible i.e. missions with a great degree of similarities. And while of course it could never be perfect it seems like if that condition were met one could draw about as valid conclusion about the comparison as would ever be possible.
 

Just FYI Hurricanes were slaughtered in air combat in the Med in 42 and were basically phased out in early 43.

P 40s meanwhile were still shooting down Axis fighters in large numbers into 44.

They were a lot faster than Hurricanes, could divw much faster and could roll as well as turn. Which apparently made a difference in combat.

I don't get why the Ludtwaffe would have been more dangerous for P-40s over Belgium than over Salerno. Same planes, same pilots right?
 
Schweik said:
P 40s meanwhile were still shooting down Axis fighters in large numbers into 44.
Click to expand...
I really have to ask the question: where?
The bulk of the air war in '44 was at higher altitudes than the P-40 was suitable at.

Are you perhaps referring to Soviet P-40s on the Eastern Front? The average altitude would have been more favorable to the Allison's performance, but by 1944, the VVS was recieving newer (native) Soviet types that would out-perform the P-40, so I can't see the Curtiss being used in any significant numbers.
 
Last edited:

Read the thread a little.

Italy / Med

Not Allison emgine
 
"The Typhoons, in spite of the two 1,000-lb bombs under their wings, were setting a crackimg pace and we had a job to keep up with them."

Pierre Clostermann, the Big Show. Pag. 91.

And Clostermann was flying Spitfire IX. What would have happened if the escort was composed of P-40s? "Please, Typhoons, please, a little bit slower..."
 

See this post, screenshot of P-40 victories in 1944 from the unit history just one Fighter Group.

1943 was the stand out year for the P-40 in warfare against the Luftwaffe, Merlin engined P-40F and Ls routinely shot down large numbers of Luftwaffe and Regia Aeronautica Fighters, it's quite well documented by the Germans and Italians themselves.

I really never get tired of posting this data so you can troll to your hearts desire. Some examples:

June 8 1943 - 3 MC 205 and 202 lost / 0 P-40Fs lost
June 10 1943 - 9 Bf 109s lost / 2 P-40Fs lost
July 8 1943 - 5 x German Bf 109G-6 lost and 1 x Italian Bf 109G lost / 3 P-40s lost
July 22 1943 - 4 x MC 205 shot down, (+ 2 x 205 'shot up by P-40s') 3 x MC 202 & 1 X D.520 shot down , Ca 309 shot down / 2 x P40 lost
July 26 1943 - 2 x Bf 109G shot down, 1 x MC 205 (+1 205 'shot up by fighters') / 0 P-40s lost
July 30 1943 - 6 x Bf 109G Shot down / 1 P-40 shot down

So far I only found one day where the Merlin engined P-40 units got defeated by a similar ratio which was in February 1943.

Now, when all these sarcastic claims are made about how slow and pathetic the P-40 was ensuring it would have been doomed in combat in NW Europe, I ask again, are there some other types of German fighters? Were they attacking Dover with Me 262 ? Did the Ta 152 have some surge in activity I never heard about?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

Paper comparing the flight performance of the P-40E Warhawk and the A6M2 Zero
Replies
8
Views
563
Ivan1GFP
I
G
Better Dambusters
2
Replies
25
Views
2K
GTX
W
The scarcity of fighter to fighter FW-190A pilot combat accounts...
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
Engineman
E
How good a plane was the P-40, really?
22 23 24
Replies
461
Views
35K
pbehn
P
Effectiveness of the P-38
6 7 8
Replies
145
Views
11K
Thumpalumpacus
Menu
Log in
Register