Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
R988 said:Just to correct an error made earlier, India does not have MiG31s, AFAIK only Russia and PRC have small numbers of MiG31s. India has Su30MKs, a sort of export version of the Su-35.
I would say Britain has the second highest potential for aerospace development, as it always has done. BAe is heavily involved with the Typhoon and also helped Saab with the JAS 39 Gripen (which also uses a licence built F404 (F/A-18 Hornet) engine from the US. France also has a reasonably well maintained aerospace industry, so europe as a whole would be second best, the main problem being sorting out all the bureaucratic red tape that strangles all their projects.
Japan mainly uses US technology with it's own contributions, like most nations, India isn't that much different nor is China, though both are maturing by developing their own indigenous aircraft.
Russia could make some top class stuff if they actually had any money. Their missiles are some of the best in the world currently, and their combat aircraft are probably some of the best in the world if you consider value for money. They are suffering from lack of investment though, and I would say their industry is in decline for the time being, any talent they have is likely to be lured to somewhere one of the other countries these days.
syscom3 said:The country that deploys UAV's designed specifically for air-to-air that are autonomous, will own the airspace over the battlefield.
davparlr said:Eventually you will be correct. This is an exciting field to get into. Unfortunately, politics will delay onset. General and Admirals responsible for weapons procurement are typically fighter pilots and will delay any progress the best they can. They are the latest "battleship admirals".
syscom3 said:Agree'd.
Unfortunatley for them, the cost of building these new fighters are so expensive (let alone train pilots and keep them proficient) that simple economics is going to be the end of most of the dangerous manned missions.
the lancaster kicks *** said:Ozumn i fail to see why you're opposed to Eu fighters? (i'm not too sure if you are or not) there are a LOT of politics that get in the way of development but all the same some of Europe's jointly developed aircraft are the best in the world, and sharing out the cost whilst getting the knowledge of half a continent isn't a bad thing, many joint Eu fighters are at the very least the equal of American fighters, the Airbusses aint too bad either, and look what happens when the Uk and US join forces.........
the lancaster kicks *** said:and don't you forget it