wiking85
Staff Sergeant
Assuming one of the following options were available, which would have been better for the LW assuming they worked: mass production of a 1750hp Jumo 213 in mid/late 1942 or waiting for a 2000hp Jumo 222 in early/mid1943? The 213 would probably be upgraded to 2000hp status in production in 1944, while the 222 would reach 2500hp in production in 1944.
As far as physical characteristics, the 222 is about 130kg heavier, 130mm longer, and IIRC about 400mm wider. The 222 is more complex, but more fuel efficient due to its smaller cylinders, which allow for greater fuel efficiency; unlike the Napier Sabre, the layout of the 222 doesn't make it nearly as complex to service, but it does have to be removed from its mounting to be properly looked after.
I'm inclined to see the 222 as worth waiting for, as at best the 213 will be cleared for mass production 12 months early, if even that, and will take a while to phase in, while not offering that much of a boost over existing engines given that it would require major retooling. Waiting an extra 12 months for the Jumo 222 (if not altered in power output it should be entering limited production in late 1942 and full production in early 1943). In all assuming the best case scenario for both engines the 213 would get into production perhaps 6 months earlier than the 222, while not needing as much retooling/retraining to produce, but still causing significant disruptions to existing engine production. The 222 on the other hand, with it working it wouldn't cause much disruption due to Ostmark being able to start on schedule with Jumo 222 production, rather than needing to be modified to produce a different engine, be it the 213 or DB603. Plus future power output of the 222 is superior to the 213; by 1943 Jumo engineers had a 2500hp version working without changing the bore and stoke of the 222:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junkers_Jumo_222
The difference is that with Ostmark in production of the 222 in 1943 the 2500hp version could be phased in even with Dessau being bombed, rather than the historical version of waiting to boost power before putting in production and then having production plans wrecked by administrative fiat bombing of the sole production facility set up for it at Dessau.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junkers_Jumo_213#Specifications_.28Jumo_213E.29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junkers_Jumo_222#Specifications_.28Jumo_222A.29
As far as physical characteristics, the 222 is about 130kg heavier, 130mm longer, and IIRC about 400mm wider. The 222 is more complex, but more fuel efficient due to its smaller cylinders, which allow for greater fuel efficiency; unlike the Napier Sabre, the layout of the 222 doesn't make it nearly as complex to service, but it does have to be removed from its mounting to be properly looked after.
I'm inclined to see the 222 as worth waiting for, as at best the 213 will be cleared for mass production 12 months early, if even that, and will take a while to phase in, while not offering that much of a boost over existing engines given that it would require major retooling. Waiting an extra 12 months for the Jumo 222 (if not altered in power output it should be entering limited production in late 1942 and full production in early 1943). In all assuming the best case scenario for both engines the 213 would get into production perhaps 6 months earlier than the 222, while not needing as much retooling/retraining to produce, but still causing significant disruptions to existing engine production. The 222 on the other hand, with it working it wouldn't cause much disruption due to Ostmark being able to start on schedule with Jumo 222 production, rather than needing to be modified to produce a different engine, be it the 213 or DB603. Plus future power output of the 222 is superior to the 213; by 1943 Jumo engineers had a 2500hp version working without changing the bore and stoke of the 222:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junkers_Jumo_222
Junkers still did not give up. Using the original 46.4 litre displacement A/B design, they added a new two-stage supercharger including a trio of aftercoolers, one per pair of neighboring cylinder banks for high-altitude use, producing the 222E and F-series. Although sea-level performance was unchanged, the engine was able to produce 1,439 kW (1,930 hp) at 9,000 m (29,530 ft). By this point it appeared that the problems were finally being worked out, but bombing of the Junkers Motorenwerke's headquarters factories in Dessau made production almost impossible.
The difference is that with Ostmark in production of the 222 in 1943 the 2500hp version could be phased in even with Dessau being bombed, rather than the historical version of waiting to boost power before putting in production and then having production plans wrecked by administrative fiat bombing of the sole production facility set up for it at Dessau.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junkers_Jumo_213#Specifications_.28Jumo_213E.29
General characteristics
Type: 12-cylinder supercharged liquid-cooled inverted Vee piston aircraft engine
Bore: 150 mm (5.906 in)
Stroke: 165 mm (6.496 in)
Displacement: 35 L (2,135.2 in³)
Length: 2,266 mm (89.2 in)
Dry weight: 940 kg (2,072 lb)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junkers_Jumo_222#Specifications_.28Jumo_222A.29
General characteristics
Type: 6-bank, 24-cylinder supercharged liquid-cooled in-line aircraft engine
Bore: 135 mm (5.3 in)
Stroke: 135 mm (5.3 in)
Displacement: 46.5 L (2,830 in³)
Length: 2,400 mm (94.5 in)
Diameter: 1,160 mm (45.7 in)
Dry weight: 1,088 kg (2,399 lb)