Readie
Chief Master Sergeant
So...which one did?
I'll prepare my case for the noble Lancaster.
Cheers
John
I'll prepare my case for the noble Lancaster.
Cheers
John
Which WW2 bomber had the most flexible adaptable bomb load?
- Thread starter Readie
- Start date
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
- Thread starter
- #3
Readie
Chief Master Sergeant
- Thread starter
- #5
Readie
Chief Master Sergeant
Mustang nut
Banned
- 200
- Jun 14, 2011
edited
Last edited:
evangilder
"Shooter"
I'd go with the de Havilland Mosquito
Lancaster bomb loads
Bomb Loads
Bomb Loads
Mustang nut
Banned
- 200
- Jun 14, 2011
edited
Last edited:
Lighthunmust
Banned
Flexible as in variety of types and sizes possible? Well I know the Lancaster can carry the smallest bombs and the largest bombs. It probably could deploy torpedos, mines, glide bombs, guided bombs, cruise missiles, etc, if tasked to do so. Bouncing bombs could be also called unpowered torpedos or glide bombs. The only aircraft I think could possibly compete with the Lancaster's inherent flexibility of type and size would be the B-29 if modified for the tasks. I think a Lancaster would be a safer options for torpedo launching altitudes than a B-29. I am too lazy right now to look up the bomb load capacity and maximum potential bomb lengths of the Lanc to the Superfort for comparison. Come on John I know you have it in you.
Last edited:
davebender
1st Lieutenant
The Do-217 could carry an aerial torpedo in the bomb bay. Plus all the weapon options available to the He-111.
GrauGeist
Generalfeldmarschall zur Luftschiff Abteilung
I think that one of the more versatile bombers of WWII would be the Ju88...
The list of variants and roles is a long one, but in short, it was a bomber, a dive bomber, torpedo bomber, bomber interceptor, "heavy fighter", night fighter and performed mine-laying, ground attack, anti-tank, photo recon and specialty missions.
It was used as a test bed for R&D and was also used as a "Mistal" platform (flying bomb).
It was operated by over half a dozen air forces and was in use from the beginning to the end of the war...not too shabby for a "medium bomber"
The list of variants and roles is a long one, but in short, it was a bomber, a dive bomber, torpedo bomber, bomber interceptor, "heavy fighter", night fighter and performed mine-laying, ground attack, anti-tank, photo recon and specialty missions.
It was used as a test bed for R&D and was also used as a "Mistal" platform (flying bomb).
It was operated by over half a dozen air forces and was in use from the beginning to the end of the war...not too shabby for a "medium bomber"
Lighthunmust
Banned
I think that one of the more versatile bombers of WWII would be the Ju88...
The list of variants and roles is a long one, but in short, it was a bomber, a dive bomber, torpedo bomber, bomber interceptor, "heavy fighter", night fighter and performed mine-laying, ground attack, anti-tank, photo recon and specialty missions.
It was used as a test bed for R&D and was also used as a "Mistal" platform (flying bomb).
It was operated by over half a dozen air forces and was in use from the beginning to the end of the war...not too shabby for a "medium bomber"
From what I understand, when USAAF technical teams examined the Ju88 they were extremely impressed with the ingenuity of design. It truly was an effective aircraft that did something many aircraft designed for versatility failed to achieve: more than mediocrity at all things.
Last edited:
I think of the "early design" bombers the most adaptable would be the Lancaster, it certainly was more adaptable than the B-17 and B-24. The B-29 in my opinion is the most capable however, as it could operationaly carry the same things the Lancaster could do plus one thing the Lancaster could not, the A-Bomb.
Certainly options for this discussion are:
Lancaster
B-29
Ju 88
Mossie
Certainly options for this discussion are:
Lancaster
B-29
Ju 88
Mossie
Last edited:
- Thread starter
- #18
Readie
Chief Master Sergeant
Yes,you are right about the 'early design' bombers Adler.
I know you are a real admirer of the superfortress but, as its involvement in WW2 is minimal compared to others you mention its not a relevant comparison perhaps?
Only the B29 could hit Japan as hard as the USAAF did there no argument with that but, Europe was the real war of attrition and involved stretching the RAF and USAAF to the limits of their ingenuity and aircraft capability. Not to mention the aircrews endurance.
Cheers
John
Actually, I am not that big on the Superfortress. I much prefer the B-17 and the Lancaster, but credit is due where credit is due. I also will not downplay the role the B-29 played in WW2 and shaping the world after WW2. When discussing capability the B-29 was the better than any heavy bomber of WW2, and that includes the Lanc.
Readie said:
Involvement in WW2 is not a criteria in this topic is it? The criteria was "most flexible and adaptable".
In flexible and adaptable I will still stick with my above most:
Early designs: Lancaster
Late Design and overall: B-29 (It could carry anything the Lanc could, plus one thing the Lanc could not. Just the fact that it was used to launch rocket aircraft in tests after the war will show the adaptability and flexibility of the aircraft)
Over Europe, I will completely agree with you that the Lancaster was the best heavy bomber in the skies. It was not without flaws (which I think that some people from the Island up north like to believe...
), but it was not the best overall, and in this case the B-29 still takes it (based off of the thread criteria).- Thread starter
- #20
Readie
Chief Master Sergeant
Actually, I am not that big on the Superfortress. I much prefer the B-17 and the Lancaster, but credit is due where credit is due. I also will not downplay the role the B-29 played in WW2 and shaping the world after WW2. When discussing capability the B-29 was the better than any heavy bomber of WW2, and that includes the Lanc.
Involvement in WW2 is not a criteria in this topic is it? The criteria was "most flexible and adaptable".
In flexible and adaptable I will still stick with my above most:
Early designs: Lancaster
Late Design and overall: B-29 (It could carry anything the Lanc could, plus one thing the Lanc could not. Just the fact that it was used to launch rocket aircraft in tests after the war will show the adaptability and flexibility of the aircraft)
Over Europe, I will completely agree with you that the Lancaster was the best heavy bomber in the skies. It was not without flaws (which I think that some people from the Island up north like to believe...
Hi Alder,
'Island up north'? Or..you mean me
.I thought you were refering to Iceland for a minute
I will grudgingly admit that the Lancaster had flaws, what aircraft doesn't?AND before you say anything...the Spitfire was perfect 8)
I have something to admit, I have realised that when I posted this thread I was only thinking about the European war.
I should been more er, wide sighted but, I wasn't.
Yes, of course the B29 was a splendid bomber but, it was 'next generation' as I have before and its not a fair comparison with the early war designs. It would like comparing the B29 to the B52...
So, where do we go from here?
Cheers
John
