Which WWII aircraft would you choose?

[GrauGeist]

Choose for what role?

Air show circuit, private collection, one-upping your rich buddies, impressing that hot girl that's into vintage warplanes or pure notoriety of having the only example in the world (if you chose to have a non-existing type built).

 

[wlewisiii]

I'm torn between three rather different aircraft.

1) Boeing P-26 (since the P-12 is just too far pre-war to justify) because I think it would be enormous fun to fly from the nearest grass runway.

2) Curtis P-40Q - The ultimate development of the line. A bubble canopy on the P-40 alone is worth it.

3) F-15A Reporter - fast, highly maneuverable, cool looking, and shows what the P-61 could have been like with Turbocharging, a radar nose and the 4 20mm's in the belly from the very beginning.

In the end, I'd probably pick the P-26. It could probably run on Mo-Gas and the little local airport would be fine

 

[herman1rg]

It would have to be a Hawker Hurricane, with the DH Mosquito a very close second.

 

[fastmongrel]

A SARO Lerwick just so I could find out why it was such a bag of sh1t. It should have been a good seaplane in the class of the Catalina and Dornier 24 but it was an utter disaster 21 were built 11 lost due to accidents and zero contact with the enemy.

 

[Escuadrilla Azul]

Tough answer, but I would choose a CANT Z 1007 twin fin, nice lines and a rarity.

 

[jetcal1]

Why a C-54 with an air conditioned VVIP interior for 12 of course. I can take my friends and camping isn't a problem at Oshkosh. Tricycle gear and parts still available.

If not? A puffed up On Mark Marksman B-26 would be ok.

 

[Mad Dog]

Ok, so you have the finances and technical connections to have any single aircraft of WWII that actually existed during the war, built from the ground up, regardless of type or nationality - what would it be and why.....

That is a toughie! Probably one of these four, in this order:
Gloster Gladiator II - 'cos best of the biplanes!
Hawker Tempest V - sweet looking brute with speed and awesome climb, would be amazing as an airshow mount.
Westland Whirlwind - as with the Tempest, only with twin-engine safety.
Hawker Hurricane IIA - 'cos it's a Hurricane you can put drop-tanks on.

 

[wuzak]

Didn't he successfully break a speed record? Close enough?

Yes, he broke a few records.

In the H-1 racer he set the land plane speed record 352mph. Many people who cite that face forget to mention the land plane category and that an Italian had gone nearly 100mph faster a year earlier).

He also broke the trans-continental record in the H-1 (with different wings and more fuel).

Other records he set were in aircraft built by other manufacturers.

 

[SaparotRob]

Yes, he broke a few records.

In the H-1 racer he set the land plane speed record 352mph. Many people who cite that face forget to mention the land plane category and that an Italian had gone nearly 100mph faster a year earlier).

He also broke the trans-continental record in the H-1 (with different wings and more fuel).

Other records he set were in aircraft built by other manufacturers.

Those were the only aviation successes of his I could think of. Not actually coming up with a successful plane. Successful or not, his twin engines recon plane (XF-11?) was beautiful.

 

[wuzak]

Those were the only aviation successes of his I could think of. Not actually coming up with a successful plane. Successful or not, his twin engines recon plane (XF-11?) was beautiful.

The problem for the XF-11 (and XF-12) was that the war was coming to an end during their development, and had finished by the time they flew. The role they were designed for - long range photo reconnaissance - was taken over by modified B-29s. The post war budget was slashed, many programs were cut, and using existing B-29 airframes for the reconnaissance role was cheaper than acquiring new designs.

And the jets were coming.

It would, therefore, be harsh to describe the XF-11 as a failure. Just had bad timing.

It would be fair to say that Hughes' other WW2 aircraft were failures, which possibly owed as much to his personality as any failing of the aircraft themselves.

 

[Greyman]

What would it take (in terms of modifications) to get the FAA on board with an Me 163?

 

[RagTag]

Go STOL...The Vought XF5U Flying Flapjack so we could see what modern powerplants, composite materials and automated flight controls could do to let the design reach its potential...definitely an air show stopper. I get to count this because the prototype rolled out on August 20, 1945, thirteen days before the end of the War!

 

[NevadaK]

Go STOL...The Vought XF5U Flying Flapjack so we could see what modern powerplants, composite materials and automated flight controls could do to let the design reach its potential...definitely an air show stopper. I get to count this because the prototype rolled out on August 20, 1945, thirteen days before the end of the War!
View attachment 591192

Hell Yeah!

 

[GrauGeist]

Go STOL...The Vought XF5U Flying Flapjack so we could see what modern powerplants, composite materials and automated flight controls could do to let the design reach its potential...definitely an air show stopper. I get to count this because the prototype rolled out on August 20, 1945, thirteen days before the end of the War!

The XF5U-1 certainly counts, though it first "flew" in 1943. And by saying "flew", they were short hops during ground/taxi tests.
It's predecessor, the V-173 actually flew (first flight a year earlier).

 

[Acheron]

Whatever was the winner of the ugliest aircraft thread. Then I would demand money from people not to fly it around for all to see.

 

[GreenKnight121]

OK - I'd take two non-surviving versions of the P-38... and merge them!

Start with a P-38M night-fighter version (less the back-seat radar equipment):


And graft on the nose of a P-38L "Droop Snoot" pathfinder version (less the bomb-aimer equipment):



Instant 3-place P-38!

 

[SaparotRob]

What would it take (in terms of modifications) to get the FAA on board with an Me 163?

It'd be really neat to see a catapult launch of one of those.

 

[chipieal]

I would have to say a P-47 later model. After all the idea of a combat plane is 1) to successfully fight 2) get the pilot back no matter the battle damage. i like the idea of the Chrysler built Hemi engine. Tests show over 500 mph. However I wonder about compressability and supersonic rate on propeller tips?

 

[Mad Dog]

Those were the only aviation successes of his I could think of. Not actually coming up with a successful plane. Successful or not, his twin engines recon plane (XF-11?) was beautiful.

Hey, if we're going post-War, I want my Convair Pogo (with modern automatic landing computer).

 

[GrauGeist]

What would it take (in terms of modifications) to get the FAA on board with an Me 163?

There is a replica of a 163 that's been around a while. It was built as a glider by a Luftwaffe pilot and it still appears at Airshows.
It's civil registry is D-1636 if you wish to read more about it.