Why the Germans called MG151/20 and not MK151/20

This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

tomo pauk

Creator of Interesting Threads
12,945
3,720
Apr 3, 2008
Wasn't the main task of the MG 151(/15) to fire explosive projectiles? That makes it cannon in my eyes.
The MG/FF also was caled MG, yet the projectiles were of the explosive kind.

However, Germans called the 45-ton tank a medium tank back in WWII, so anything goes as far as names ase issue...
 
Last edited:

-echo-

Recruit
6
0
Jan 20, 2009
Germans just designate ALL weapon 20mm and under as MG . That`s all .
 

CharlesBronson

Senior Master Sergeant
3,568
87
Jan 11, 2005
Cordoba - Argentina
I think because is a derivate of the a heavy maschinegun wich was MG 151.

Wasn't the main task of the MG 151(/15) to fire explosive projectiles? That makes it cannon in my eyes

I ve seen pictures of the belt used in Bf-109 and Hs-129 and the combination in more or less 1 to 1, that mean 50% of armor piercing and the other half of high explosives.

The capacity of firing high explosives does not defines ( by itself) a cannon, remember that rifle calibre several machineguns, including the Vickers water cooled .303 could fire explosive ammunition.
 

Users who are viewing this thread