Worst Piston Monoplane Fighter of WWII

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

If one accepts prototypes, there's always the various experimental fighters, like the XP-54, XP-55, XP-57, and XP-77. For something in large scale production, the Blacburn Roc wins the booby* prize.


* Except boobies can fly well
 
Not one of Russia's finest engineering moments...

img276.jpg


(Air International March 1993)
 
Some fighters relied on a mechanism to compress the oleo length on retraction. Certainly a Corsair's fully extended Oleo's wouldn't fit into the wells.
 
If one accepts prototypes, there's always the various experimental fighters, like the XP-54, XP-55, XP-57, and XP-77. For something in large scale production, the Blacburn Roc wins the booby* prize.


* Except boobies can fly well

The XP-56 was pretty woeful.
 
The XP-56 was pretty woeful.
I don't think that you can call any experimental fighter that never entered service in WW2, the worst fighter, but you could add something like the Blackburn Firebrand because it underwent a re-design to a torpedo strike aircraft so that it could do something useful after WW2.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back