WWII - Aircraft produced in large quantities that did not see combat - or very little

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

We seem to have 3 categories. Perhaps Conslaw can give us some guidance in what he intended?

3. Planes that were ordered in large numbers, either before the fighting started or after that turned out to be not what was promised/desired once the realities of combat had sunk in. (Polite way of saying dud) and were shuffled off to secondary duties (or parked) as soon as possible.

Funny thing though, the BA.88 I listed would have been literally two weeks production for 1943 North America, but were a sizable quantity for Breda and Italy. Do we consider industrial capacity as well?
 
I tried to find some figures of how many P-38L models were never shipped to combat units. I have an unconfirmed hunch that it was the majority of them. Almost 4,000 P-38Ls were built. (I find that kind of ironic, because for most of the war, the front-line commanders were screaming they couldn't get enough P-38s, and when the best P-38 of all became available, in a lot of cases, there was no place for them.) If somebody could find figures either backing this up or refuting it, that would be great.
 
Another thing I noticed in USAAF statistics is that the P-40 seems to have been the main type used for fighter pilot training in 1944/45, which explains where alot of the 5,000 P-40N's went.

But IMHO this thread is for planes that failed to make it as a combat plane. The Italian Ba88 as mentioned already was a spectacular failure, although I can't understand why a plane that set speed records with 1000kg loads, would become an unusable plane by wartime.
 
"But IMHO this thread is for planes that failed to make it as a combat plane. The Italian Ba88 as mentioned already was a spectacular failure said:
I'd imagine the combination of added weight, sand filters, and lack of reserve growth for engines killed it.
 
Don't mean to get off subject, but the Soviet operation mentioned by Fubar57 back in post #18 was named Operation August Storm not Autumn Storm in case anyone tries to do further research. A very good academic study was done on this fascinating and little known, massive operation that achieve total surprise.

HERE

Some historians contend that the loss of the entire Japanese Kwantung Army and its Manchukuoan and Inner Mongolian auxiliaries was the most probable reason the Japanese surrendered and not the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

In World War Two the majority of combatants surrendered only after their field armies were destroyed. The loss of their cities and large numbers of their citizens being killed was not what seems to have caused them to surrender. It could be argued that the French, Germans, Italians, and Japanese surrendered only after they had no viable ground troops left.

The Soviets destroyed the last field army of the Japanese in Operation August Storm.
 
Funny thing though, the BA.88 I listed would have been literally two weeks production for 1943 North America, but were a sizable quantity for Breda and Italy. Do we consider industrial capacity as well?

I think so. Remember, the purpose of this forum is to spread tidbits of information that aviation enthusiasts find interesting. Most of us want as much info as we can get our hands on.
 
The champion waste of resources has to be the B-24E. Willow Run produced 801 of them (including knock down kits for final assembly by Consolidated and Douglas). Because Willow Run was so slow in getting up and running (Will It Run) and because Fords production methods were so inflexible, they were obsolete before they left the factory. As such none of them saw combat. This was in late 1942 and early 1943 when there was a massive shortage of heavy bombers with, for example, RAF Coastal Command having to use inferior aircraft in the Battle of the Atlantic.
The expenditure on 800 four engine bombers is far more significant than on any of the other aircraft named so far.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back