XB-70 valkyrie vs B-1B lancer

[DerAdlerIstGelandet]

There is nothing wrong with loving a plane. That includes the XB-70. I think its cool as hell. It's time is long since past though. That's fact.

 

[VA5124]

There is nothing wrong with loving a plane. That includes the XB-70. I think its cool as hell. It's time is long since past though. That's fact.

ok i concede that but i love the xb-70 as much as i do the swing wing tomcat

 

[soulezoo]

Now John Boyd is rolling in his grave.

 

[msxyz]

maybe but i want a supersonic bomber in service

Here's the right plane for you then:

Fast (Mach 2.8+, though the airframe can survive at least Mach 3.2) and armed with an hypersonic standoff missile! Happy?

 

[swampyankee]

misslles do no good if the grid is down and you cant lauch them

The deterrent forces use auxiliary generators and multiple, redundant communications channels. Also, SSBN are much more autonomous than a bomber could ever be.

 

[SaparotRob]

Hey VA2154, check out the CF-105. That has always been a smoking hot "could of been".

 

[VA5124]

Hey VA2154, check out the CF-105. That has always been a smoking hot "could of been".

that the b-70 and the tsr 2

 

[GrauGeist]

Here's the right plane for you then:

View attachment 631578

Fast (Mach 2.8+, though the airframe can survive at least Mach 3.2) and armed with an hypersonic standoff missile! Happy?

My money would have been on the YF-12...

 

[VA5124]

My money would have been on the YF-12...

whats your opion on the the tu 160 nato reporting codename blackjack

 

[GrauGeist]

whats your opion on the the tu 160 nato reporting codename blackjack

I think the Sukhoi T-4 was better...

 

[VA5124]

I think the Sukhoi T-4 was better...

i like the 160 its not a bad bomber

 

[GrauGeist]

i like the 160 its not a bad bomber

If you look closely, you'll find the Tu-160 is just a larger version of the B-1.
The Soviets built it in response to the B-1 program, so no coincidence.

But I still think the Soviets would.have been better off with the T-4.

 

[VA5124]

If you look closely, you'll find the Tu-160 is just a larger version of the B-1.
The Soviets built it in response to the B-1 program, so no coincidence.

But I still think the Soviets would.have been better off with the T-4.

i dont know the full history of the 160 so

 

[GrauGeist]

i dont know the full history of the 160 so

I rarely recommend Wikipedia, but for a brief overview, I'll make an exception.

On the Tu-160:
Tupolev Tu-160 - Wikipedia

On the Sukhoi T-4:
Sukhoi T-4 - Wikipedia

 

[VA5124]

I rarely recommend Wikipedia, but for a brief overview, I'll make an exception.

On the Tu-160:
Tupolev Tu-160 - Wikipedia

On the Sukhoi T-4:
Sukhoi T-4 - Wikipedia

ill read those later right now im reading about boeing aircraft and im wondering if a mw2 style invaison is possible (theres a misson in mw2 where the russins knock out the sats and then attack the us )

 

[GrauGeist]

MW2...I'm not sure what that is.

I am familiar with Mechwarrior 2 (MW2) and Mechwarrior 3 (MW3) but those were set in the future...

 

[VA5124]

MW2...I'm not sure what that is.

I am familiar with Mechwarrior 2 (MW2) and Mechwarrior 3 (MW3) but those were set in the future...

modern warfare 2 its part of the call of duty series(im also a gamer(

 

[DerAdlerIstGelandet]

ill read those later right now im reading about boeing aircraft and im wondering if a mw2 style invaison is possible (theres a misson in mw2 where the russins knock out the sats and then attack the us )

If it ain't Boeing, I ain't going...

 

[GrauGeist]

modern warfare 2 its part of the call of duty series(im also a gamer(

Ohhh...ok.

Makes sense, now.

 

[VA5124]

If it ain't Boeing, I ain't going...

Ohhh...ok.

Makes sense, now.

so do you think a modern warfare 2 style invasion is possible