1946: Best piston engine fighter in the world?

Which was the best piston engine fighter, 1946?


  • Total voters
    70

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Ok here are some speed charts:

P47N 385kts = 443 mph @ 35000'

P47M 480 kts = 470 mph @ 32000'

P51H 410 kts = 471 mph @ 22700'

F8F-2 388 kts = 446 mph @ 28000'

F4U-4 387 kts = 446 mph @ 26200'

F2G-1 375 kts = 431 mph @ 16900'
 

Attachments

  • F4U4 Charts_page1_image1.jpg
    F4U4 Charts_page1_image1.jpg
    106.3 KB · Views: 146
  • F8F2 Charts_page1_image1.jpg
    F8F2 Charts_page1_image1.jpg
    133.7 KB · Views: 151
  • p47m-n-speed.jpg
    p47m-n-speed.jpg
    88.5 KB · Views: 161
  • P47N-chart_page1_image1.jpg
    P47N-chart_page1_image1.jpg
    91.8 KB · Views: 154
  • P51H Charts_page1_image1.jpg
    P51H Charts_page1_image1.jpg
    91.9 KB · Views: 153
  • F2G Chart_page1_image1.jpg
    F2G Chart_page1_image1.jpg
    134 KB · Views: 131
Here's a climb chart for the Spitfire 21.

http://www.spitfireperformance.com/dp851climb.jpg

The max rate of climb for the 21 (prototype) was 4800fpm at 7700ft, using a Griffon 61 with +18psi boost at 9000lb AUW. Peak RoC was lower than the P-51H, but it still looks to get to 25k ft first.

Max speed was 455mph, some 20mph down on the P-51H, but how important was that?

Service ceiling 42,800ft.

Spitfire Mk 21 Performance

Anbody got any numbers for a 24 with Griffon 65?
 
Last edited:
A Spitfire F.Mk24 was rated to 454 @ 26000' with a combat climb to 25kft in 6.1 minutes (it carried more fuel than the Mk21.) This is with the Griffon 61.

However, the Spiteful MkXVI with a Griffon 101 could do 494 @ 27500' and climb to 20Kft in 4.9 minutes

Darn hard to find tangible information spitfires equipped with the griffon 85.
 
A Spitfire F.Mk24 was rated to 454 @ 26000' with a combat climb to 25kft in 6.1 minutes (it carried more fuel than the Mk21.) This is with the Griffon 61.

However, the Spiteful MkXVI with a Griffon 101 could do 494 @ 27500' and climb to 20Kft in 4.9 minutes

Darn hard to find tangible information spitfires equipped with the griffon 85.
I'm a bit confused. The only MkXVI I could find was a Packard or RR Merlin powered model with much less performance. Where did you get this info?
 
I'm a bit confused. The only MkXVI I could find was a Packard or RR Merlin powered model with much less performance. Where did you get this info?

It is the Spiteful version
 

Attachments

  • 1 - Copy.jpg
    1 - Copy.jpg
    176.9 KB · Views: 139
  • 2 - Copy.jpg
    2 - Copy.jpg
    126.2 KB · Views: 152
Here is another speed chart I found with the Hornet plotted
 

Attachments

  • late speedchart.jpg
    late speedchart.jpg
    157.8 KB · Views: 152
Spitfire by Alfred Price Chapter 33 Test Flying the Spiteful by Patrick Shea-Simonds
"Because of the low speed handling characteristics encountered with the Spiteful we spent a lot of time trying to improve matters on the second prototype and early production aircraft. ....
But these improvements were made at the expense of all out speed, with the result that the performance of the Spiteful ended up little better than that of the Spitfire 22."
 
I have to go with the Sea Hornet. I like Eric Brown's evaluation. The thread says best of 1946 with no qualifications, guns, range or mission except to beat the other fighter one on one with pilots being equal.
 
How so? Did six .50 cal. HMG's suddenly lose all effect the moment the war ended but the eight .50's in the Jug keep their punch?

The .50 by the end of the war was on the way out as a worthwhile gun. If you wanted to knock bombers and armoured fighters down 20mm cannon we're the minimum.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back