Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I'm a bit confused. The only MkXVI I could find was a Packard or RR Merlin powered model with much less performance. Where did you get this info?A Spitfire F.Mk24 was rated to 454 @ 26000' with a combat climb to 25kft in 6.1 minutes (it carried more fuel than the Mk21.) This is with the Griffon 61.
However, the Spiteful MkXVI with a Griffon 101 could do 494 @ 27500' and climb to 20Kft in 4.9 minutes
Darn hard to find tangible information spitfires equipped with the griffon 85.
I'm a bit confused. The only MkXVI I could find was a Packard or RR Merlin powered model with much less performance. Where did you get this info?
I'm a bit confused. The only MkXVI I could find was a Packard or RR Merlin powered model with much less performance. Where did you get this info?
Spiteful XVI - laminar flow trapezoidal wing, low line wing mounted radiators, Griffon 65 or 85.
Undergunned.Tough to argue against the P-51H, it seems to hold all the cards
Undergunned.
That was easy.
How so? Did six .50 cal. HMG's suddenly lose all effect the moment the war ended but the eight .50's in the Jug keep their punch?
Hawker Fury with the 3,500 hp Napier Saber MkVII that could go to 4,000 hp emergency power.
Nope. Tne P-47 was undergunned too.How so? Did six .50 cal. HMG's suddenly lose all effect the moment the war ended but the eight .50's in the Jug keep their punch?
Touche'Undergunned.
That was easy.