OkDerAdlerIstGelandet , I am going to be civil about this. Please read posts. Don't call people asses. Your a mod, be above that.
This is the second time you think I'm going after you or want to insult you (post 103). IDK why but you do. Never thought of it, nor will I. I have no beef with you.
You were not part of post 228, the other mod was. If you read the post you would see this clear as day.
My post 296 could have been better worded to direct it at the party which dismisses the archival evidence, not solely at yourself. Sorry. Not everything is directed against you.
From your post 260 I guess you align yourself with the dismissive part. If yes, then post 296 partly applies to yourself then too.
Its OK to not agree on what constitutes a victory. One side has the documented evidence, the other side does not. One is welcome to choose which one they wish to stay in.
lol
You responded to my post saying to post up some evidence.
For someone who claims to do otherwise you have a habit of doing it.
As for the last part of your post, data does not prove anything definitely, in this particular topic for reasons already discussed by many, so its not a matter if choosing a side to stay in. Thanks though…