Thank you very much, Rob, for your measurements information of the A6M5.
They are so valuable because you measured them by yourself and, sorry, I did not know you are so serious about your RC project.
Take my apology.
As Eric pointed out in his post #15 with detailed examples, I knew there were measurement differences of A6Ms by the maker or
the model but, this time, those differences between Rob's and mine are more than my expectation.
My measurement was based on a photo taken during the war and I obtained it from a reliable source in larger size.
I have trially checked each difference ratio to compare.
The bigger was mine.
Vertical ratio:
1.0288983050847457627118644067797 for the height
1.0274193548387096774193548387097 for the center line from top
Average 1.028158829961727720065609622744
Horizontal ratio:
1.017471042471042471042471042471 for the fillets distance
1.022869022869022869022869022869 for the widest of fuselage
Average 1.02017003267003267003267003267
To my wonder, the vertical ratio is bigger.
It is longer 1.0078308488152572251726667272541 times than the horizontal.
I have asked one of my friends who also studys the A6Ms for a long time.
"I can't tell, my friend, the exact width as I don't know but the height of No.7 was 1180mm."
The photo might have been distorted longer or shorter though I believe it was an original print
I do appreciate, Rob, for you precious information.