Aircraft Identification Thread 2

• Jan 28, 2005

• #21

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,931

17

Dec 20, 2003

it wasn't a question...........

 

• Jan 28, 2005

• #22

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,259

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

I know, it was a rhetorical question.

 

• Jan 29, 2005

• #23

Yeomanz

Senior Airman

317

0

Nov 25, 2004

UK

Zippit why dont ya

 

• Jan 29, 2005

• #24

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,259

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

Anyway...no takers for the plane?

 

• Jan 29, 2005

• #25

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,931

17

Dec 20, 2003

it can't be a rhetorical question if it's not a question!!!!

 

• Jan 29, 2005

• #26

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,259

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

A rhetorical question is different from a question...anyway I typed it, I think I kinda know what it is...

 

• Jan 29, 2005

• #27

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,931

17

Dec 20, 2003

it wasn't a question and yes, a rethorical question does have to be a question, otherwise it's a rethorical *insert type, e.g. statement or remark*

 

• Jan 29, 2005

• #28

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,259

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

Rhetorical is a style of writing that can only be applied to questions...not statements or remarks, what I typed was a rhetorical question, there was no Question markl because it did not rerquire an answer, which is the purpose of rhetorical questions, if I wanted an answer then Id have added a question mark...

 

• Jan 29, 2005

• #29

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,931

17

Dec 20, 2003

it wasn't a question and i'm well aware of what rethorical mans, but obviously neither of us are gonna budge on this one..........

 

• Jan 29, 2005

• #30

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,259

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

I know it wasnt a question, it was a RHETORICAL question...

Im not budging cos im right and you are not budging because youre stubborn and know youre wrong...

 

• Jan 29, 2005

• #31

JCS

Senior Airman

667

4

Jul 15, 2004

Nicholson, PA

Anyways, back on topic... thats a Kokusai Ki-105...

 

• Jan 29, 2005

• #32

Yeomanz

Senior Airman

317

0

Nov 25, 2004

UK

cheddar cheese said:

I know it wasnt a question, it was a RHETORICAL question...

Im not budging cos im right and you are not budging because youre stubborn and know youre wrong...

Click to expand...

now , i dont like to speak out of turn but i think everyone will thank me for saying two little words

SHUT UP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

• Jan 29, 2005

• #33

R

R Pope

Senior Airman

318

11

Mar 10, 2004

Amen to that, brother!

 

• Jan 29, 2005

• #34

K

KraziKanuK

Banned

792

4

Jan 26, 2005

A powered version of the Ku-7 glider, a hasty lash-up to get an aircraft that could carry fuel from Sumatra to Japan. Nine built.

Type: Ki.105
Function: transport
Year: Crew: Engines: 2 * 690kW Mitsubishi Ha-26-II
Speed: 220km/h Ceiling: Range: 2500km

 

• Jan 29, 2005

• #35

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,931

17

Dec 20, 2003

he started it.............

 

• Jan 29, 2005

• #36

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,259

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

Did not...


Anyway JCS you were right. Next pic?

 

• Jan 29, 2005

• #37

JCS

Senior Airman

667

4

Jul 15, 2004

Nicholson, PA

Try this one:

 

Attachments

• 1_131.jpg

  31.2 KB · Views: 604

• Jan 30, 2005

• #38

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,259

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

R-10...I dont know the rest of the name, just that its an R-10. Used for Reconaissance yes?

 

• Jan 30, 2005

• #39

plan_D

Lieutenant Colonel

11,639

23

Apr 1, 2004

They're on Il-2 FB (AEP..blah blah blah) aren't they? i'm sure I've escorted some.

 

• Jan 30, 2005

• #40

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,259

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

Yup they are. I thought they were Turret Fighters at first